Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #58974

Re: Languages for different purposes (was Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python)

From Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk>
Subject Re: Languages for different purposes (was Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python)
Date 2013-11-09 23:24 +0000
References <CAPTjJmrdOXr31W+ta=7O1bQE9RKUj_sSeOK4s+hXSjs7357gzg@mail.gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.2314.1384039476.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


On 09/11/2013 22:58, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
> * Some languages are just fundamentally bad. I do not recommend ever
> writing production code in Whitespace, Ook, or Piet.
>

In my last job I was forced into using Apple(42 not so obvious ways to 
do it)Script.  Yuck.

-- 
Python is the second best programming language in the world.
But the best has yet to be invented.  Christian Tismer

Mark Lawrence

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Languages for different purposes (was Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python) Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-11-09 23:24 +0000
  Re: Languages for different purposes (was Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python) Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-11-09 19:41 -0500
    Re: Languages for different purposes (was Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-11-10 11:53 +1100
      Re: Languages for different purposes (was Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python) Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2013-11-10 08:56 +0000
        Re: Languages for different purposes (was Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python) 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@gmail.com> - 2013-11-11 09:51 -0800

csiph-web