Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #90123

Is this unpythonic?

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!feeder2.ecngs.de!ecngs!feeder.ecngs.de!border1.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.008
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'modify': 0.07; 'function,': 0.09; 'omit': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'used.': 0.09; 'argument,': 0.16; 'code?': 0.16; 'gotcha.': 0.16; 'pythonic': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'bit': 0.19; 'code,': 0.22; 'looks': 0.24; 'pass': 0.26; 'values': 0.27; 'header:X -Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'leave': 0.29; 'is?': 0.30; 'up.': 0.33; 'used,': 0.33; 'problem.': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'thanks': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'wrong': 0.37; 'list': 0.37; 'list.': 0.37; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'how': 0.40; 'read': 0.60; 'more': 0.64; 'frank': 0.68; 'frequently': 0.68; 'default': 0.69; 'subject:this': 0.83; 'safe.': 0.84
X-Injected-Via-Gmane http://gmane.org/
To python-list@python.org
From "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com>
Subject Is this unpythonic?
Date Fri, 8 May 2015 10:01:52 +0200
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host 197.86.223.132
X-MSMail-Priority Normal
X-Newsreader Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.3790.4657
X-RFC2646 Format=Flowed; Original
X-MimeOLE Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.4913
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.20+
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.224.1431072121.12865.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 27
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1431072121 news.xs4all.nl 2880 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:40552
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:90123

Show key headers only | View raw


Hi all

I have often read about the gotcha regarding 'mutable default arguments' 
that frequently trips people up.

I use them from time to time, but I have never had a problem. I have just 
delved a bit deeper to see if I am skating on thin ice.

AFAICT my usage is safe. If I use a list as an argument, I only use it to 
pass values *into* the function, but I never modify the list. So if I omit 
the argument, the original default empty list is used, otherwise the list 
that I pass in is used.

However, every time I look at my own code, and I see   "def x(y, z=[]): 
....."   it looks wrong because I have been conditioned to think of it as a 
gotcha.

Would it be more pythonic to change them all to use the alternative 
"z=None", or is it ok to leave it as it is? Or to phrase it differently, how 
would an experienced pythonista react on seeing this when reviewing my code?

Thanks

Frank Millman


Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Is this unpythonic? "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2015-05-08 10:01 +0200
  Re: Is this unpythonic? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-05-08 20:08 +1000
    Re: Is this unpythonic? "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2015-05-08 12:53 +0200
      Re: Is this unpythonic? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-05-09 01:07 +1000
        Re: Is this unpythonic? "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2015-05-09 07:56 +0200
        Re: Is this unpythonic? "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2015-05-09 08:51 +0200
          Re: Is this unpythonic? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2015-05-09 19:47 +1200
            Re: Is this unpythonic? "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2015-05-09 11:10 +0200
    Re: Is this unpythonic? Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2015-05-08 08:04 -0400
      Re: Is this unpythonic? Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2015-05-10 10:04 +0200
        Re: Is this unpythonic? "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2015-05-10 10:58 +0200
          Re: Is this unpythonic? Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2015-05-10 11:54 +0200
            Re: Is this unpythonic? "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2015-05-10 12:40 +0200
    Re: Is this unpythonic? "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2015-05-08 15:12 +0200

csiph-web