Re: String concatenation - which is the fastest way ?

Path	csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path	<przemolicc@poczta.fm>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	UNSURE 0.325
X-Spam-Level	***
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 0.39; 'S': 0.04; 'rows': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'interface': 0.23; '+0100,': 0.23; 'indexing': 0.23; 'pm,': 0.24; 'aug': 0.24; 'thu,': 0.28; 'oracle': 0.29; 'strings.': 0.30; 'chris': 0.32; 'list': 0.32; 'sort': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.34; 'subject: ?': 0.34; 'hold': 0.35; 'run': 0.37; 'but': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.39; 'data': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'your': 0.61; 'straight': 0.63; 'from:no real name:20': 0.63; 'charset:iso-8859-2': 0.66; '11,': 0.68; 'header:Reply-To:1': 0.71; 'reply-to:no real name:20': 0.71; 'received:pl': 0.84; 'nas': 0.84; '10000': 0.91; 'url:pl': 0.93
Date	Thu, 11 Aug 2011 16:39:23 +0200
From	przemolicc@poczta.fm
To	python-list@python.org
Subject	Re: String concatenation - which is the fastest way ?
References	<20110810111754.GD5045@host.pgf.com.pl> <CAPTjJmrF0GcVs0onfoCHAbMe38b5iLXgFX1R7G_RXcKxjPH5wQ@mail.gmail.com> <20110810133146.GE5045@host.pgf.com.pl> <j1ub3q$65c$1@dough.gmane.org> <20110811064030.GB4990@host.pgf.com.pl> <CAPTjJmqiiKcT7Zg-XkbrQ4r-keU9+1Kj=+sEwa4xp==2EG-5aQ@mail.gmail.com> <20110811134613.GE4990@host.pgf.com.pl> <CAPTjJmr7qDeGU+ttEXsdBOASqZ5w1mYgkg18o+RtFp55HHp8Ew@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version	1.0
In-Reply-To	<CAPTjJmr7qDeGU+ttEXsdBOASqZ5w1mYgkg18o+RtFp55HHp8Ew@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent	Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
X-Interia-Antivirus	OK
X-EMID	874afc98
Content-Type	text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2"
Content-Transfer-Encoding	quoted-printable
Content-Disposition	inline
X-Mailman-Approved-At	Fri, 12 Aug 2011 11:02:06 +0200
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.12
Precedence	list
Reply-To	przemolicc@poczta.fm
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.2210.1313139727.1164.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines	74
NNTP-Posting-Host	2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace	1313139727 news.xs4all.nl 23915 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:33583
X-Complaints-To	abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref	x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:11262

Show key headers only | View raw

On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 02:48:43PM +0100, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 2:46 PM,  <przemolicc@poczta.fm> wrote:
> > This is the way I am going to use.
> > But what is the best data type to hold so many rows and then operate on them ?
> >
> 
> List of strings. Take it straight from your Oracle interface and work
> with it directly.

Can I use this list in the following way ?
subprocess_1 - run on list between 1 and 10000
subprocess_2 - run on list between 10001 and 20000
subprocess_3 - run on list between 20001 and 30000
etc
...
Sort of indexing ?

Regards
Przemyslaw Bak (przemol)



















































----------------------------------------------------------------
Zmyslowa bielizna? U nas ja znajdziesz!
http://linkint.pl/f29fe

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: String concatenation - which is the fastest way ? przemolicc@poczta.fm - 2011-08-11 16:39 +0200

csiph-web