Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #11262
| Date | 2011-08-11 16:39 +0200 |
|---|---|
| From | przemolicc@poczta.fm |
| Subject | Re: String concatenation - which is the fastest way ? |
| References | (3 earlier) <j1ub3q$65c$1@dough.gmane.org> <20110811064030.GB4990@host.pgf.com.pl> <CAPTjJmqiiKcT7Zg-XkbrQ4r-keU9+1Kj=+sEwa4xp==2EG-5aQ@mail.gmail.com> <20110811134613.GE4990@host.pgf.com.pl> <CAPTjJmr7qDeGU+ttEXsdBOASqZ5w1mYgkg18o+RtFp55HHp8Ew@mail.gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2210.1313139727.1164.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 02:48:43PM +0100, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 2:46 PM, <przemolicc@poczta.fm> wrote: > > This is the way I am going to use. > > But what is the best data type to hold so many rows and then operate on them ? > > > > List of strings. Take it straight from your Oracle interface and work > with it directly. Can I use this list in the following way ? subprocess_1 - run on list between 1 and 10000 subprocess_2 - run on list between 10001 and 20000 subprocess_3 - run on list between 20001 and 30000 etc ... Sort of indexing ? Regards Przemyslaw Bak (przemol) ---------------------------------------------------------------- Zmyslowa bielizna? U nas ja znajdziesz! http://linkint.pl/f29fe
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: String concatenation - which is the fastest way ? przemolicc@poczta.fm - 2011-08-11 16:39 +0200
csiph-web