Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #11262 > unrolled thread

Re: String concatenation - which is the fastest way ?

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: String concatenation - which is the fastest way ? przemolicc@poczta.fm - 2011-08-11 16:39 +0200

#11262 — Re: String concatenation - which is the fastest way ?

On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 02:48:43PM +0100, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 2:46 PM,  <przemolicc@poczta.fm> wrote:
> > This is the way I am going to use.
> > But what is the best data type to hold so many rows and then operate on them ?
> >
> 
> List of strings. Take it straight from your Oracle interface and work
> with it directly.

Can I use this list in the following way ?
subprocess_1 - run on list between 1 and 10000
subprocess_2 - run on list between 10001 and 20000
subprocess_3 - run on list between 20001 and 30000
etc
...
Sort of indexing ?

Regards
Przemyslaw Bak (przemol)



















































----------------------------------------------------------------
Zmyslowa bielizna? U nas ja znajdziesz!
http://linkint.pl/f29fe

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python

csiph-web