Re: Static analysis tools

Path	csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path	<python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.000
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 1.00; 'S': 0.00; 'python,': 0.02; 'url:sourceforge': 0.03; 'cpython': 0.05; 'python': 0.09; 'arguments,': 0.09; 'pep': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'static': 0.13; 'fine.': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'subject:analysis': 0.16; 'subject:tools': 0.16; 'tool.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'windows': 0.19; 'python?': 0.20; 'written': 0.20; '3.2': 0.22; "i've": 0.23; 'project,': 0.24; "we'd": 0.24; 'header :In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'header:X -Complaints-To:1': 0.28; 'arguments.': 0.29; 'dan': 0.29; "i'm": 0.29; "we're": 0.30; 'keyword': 0.30; 'asking': 0.32; 'from:addr:yahoo.co.uk': 0.32; "aren't": 0.33; 'traditional': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'doing': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'received:org': 0.36; 'really': 0.36; 'but': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; 'useful': 0.36; 'far': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'mark': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'things': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'short': 0.39; 'little': 0.39; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'analysis': 0.70; 'opensource': 0.84; 'played': 0.84; 'aka': 0.91
X-Injected-Via-Gmane	http://gmane.org/
To	python-list@python.org
From	Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk>
Subject	Re: Static analysis tools
Date	Thu, 11 Oct 2012 18:39:01 +0100
References	<CAGGBd_oFK_wDEidrScvXiREsiQrggxZO=NOzZc9aPv7Va1nWkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host	host-78-147-189-214.as13285.net
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1
In-Reply-To	<CAGGBd_oFK_wDEidrScvXiREsiQrggxZO=NOzZc9aPv7Va1nWkQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Antivirus	avast! (VPS 121011-0, 11/10/2012), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status	Clean
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.15
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.2062.1349977126.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines	32
NNTP-Posting-Host	2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace	1349977126 news.xs4all.nl 6842 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:38873
X-Complaints-To	abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:31129

Show key headers only | View raw

On 11/10/2012 18:25, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> I'm familiar with pylint, and have recently played with pyflakes and
> flake8. I've also heard of pychecker.
>
> Are there others, perhaps including some that aren't written in Python, but
> still check Python?
>
> We're considering doing static analysis of a large CPython 3.2 project, but
> so far the traditional 3 seem to be coming up a little short for Python
> 3 compatibility.  Especially, they don't seem to understand PEP 3102
> AKA Keyword Only Arguments, and we really like Keyword Only Arguments.
>
> Opensource would be great,but we'd also be willing to pay for a suitable
> tool.
>
> Windows or *ix tools would be fine.
>
> Any suggestions about things to check into?
>
>
>

I've found clonedigger very useful http://clonedigger.sourceforge.net/

Not what you're asking for but figleaf is good as well 
http://darcs.idyll.org/~t/projects/figleaf/doc/

-- 
Cheers.

Mark Lawrence.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Static analysis tools Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-10-11 18:39 +0100

csiph-web