Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #31129 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2012-10-11 18:39 +0100 |
| Last post | 2012-10-11 18:39 +0100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Static analysis tools Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-10-11 18:39 +0100
| From | Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-10-11 18:39 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Static analysis tools |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2062.1349977126.27098.python-list@python.org> |
On 11/10/2012 18:25, Dan Stromberg wrote: > I'm familiar with pylint, and have recently played with pyflakes and > flake8. I've also heard of pychecker. > > Are there others, perhaps including some that aren't written in Python, but > still check Python? > > We're considering doing static analysis of a large CPython 3.2 project, but > so far the traditional 3 seem to be coming up a little short for Python > 3 compatibility. Especially, they don't seem to understand PEP 3102 > AKA Keyword Only Arguments, and we really like Keyword Only Arguments. > > Opensource would be great,but we'd also be willing to pay for a suitable > tool. > > Windows or *ix tools would be fine. > > Any suggestions about things to check into? > > > I've found clonedigger very useful http://clonedigger.sourceforge.net/ Not what you're asking for but figleaf is good as well http://darcs.idyll.org/~t/projects/figleaf/doc/ -- Cheers. Mark Lawrence.
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web