Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #31129

Re: Static analysis tools

From Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk>
Subject Re: Static analysis tools
Date 2012-10-11 18:39 +0100
References <CAGGBd_oFK_wDEidrScvXiREsiQrggxZO=NOzZc9aPv7Va1nWkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.2062.1349977126.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


On 11/10/2012 18:25, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> I'm familiar with pylint, and have recently played with pyflakes and
> flake8. I've also heard of pychecker.
>
> Are there others, perhaps including some that aren't written in Python, but
> still check Python?
>
> We're considering doing static analysis of a large CPython 3.2 project, but
> so far the traditional 3 seem to be coming up a little short for Python
> 3 compatibility.  Especially, they don't seem to understand PEP 3102
> AKA Keyword Only Arguments, and we really like Keyword Only Arguments.
>
> Opensource would be great,but we'd also be willing to pay for a suitable
> tool.
>
> Windows or *ix tools would be fine.
>
> Any suggestions about things to check into?
>
>
>

I've found clonedigger very useful http://clonedigger.sourceforge.net/

Not what you're asking for but figleaf is good as well 
http://darcs.idyll.org/~t/projects/figleaf/doc/

-- 
Cheers.

Mark Lawrence.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Static analysis tools Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-10-11 18:39 +0100

csiph-web