Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #31129
| From | Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Static analysis tools |
| Date | 2012-10-11 18:39 +0100 |
| References | <CAGGBd_oFK_wDEidrScvXiREsiQrggxZO=NOzZc9aPv7Va1nWkQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2062.1349977126.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 11/10/2012 18:25, Dan Stromberg wrote: > I'm familiar with pylint, and have recently played with pyflakes and > flake8. I've also heard of pychecker. > > Are there others, perhaps including some that aren't written in Python, but > still check Python? > > We're considering doing static analysis of a large CPython 3.2 project, but > so far the traditional 3 seem to be coming up a little short for Python > 3 compatibility. Especially, they don't seem to understand PEP 3102 > AKA Keyword Only Arguments, and we really like Keyword Only Arguments. > > Opensource would be great,but we'd also be willing to pay for a suitable > tool. > > Windows or *ix tools would be fine. > > Any suggestions about things to check into? > > > I've found clonedigger very useful http://clonedigger.sourceforge.net/ Not what you're asking for but figleaf is good as well http://darcs.idyll.org/~t/projects/figleaf/doc/ -- Cheers. Mark Lawrence.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Static analysis tools Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-10-11 18:39 +0100
csiph-web