Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #111661
| Path | csiph.com!1.us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed8.news.xs4all.nl!bcyclone05.am1.xlned.com!bcyclone05.am1.xlned.com!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!newsfeed.kamp.net!newsfeed.kamp.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: Floating point equality [was Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings)] |
| Date | Wed, 20 Jul 2016 09:09:29 +0200 |
| Lines | 35 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2.1468998615.22221.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| References | <nlmpl5$9l4$1@dont-email.me> <nm6kbb$t6b$1@ger.gmane.org> <mailman.51.1468454075.21009.python-list@python.org> <7046c74e-e5ea-4dde-8847-8c556756a563@googlegroups.com> <5789B601.9000604@stoneleaf.us> <mailman.26.1468642801.2307.python-list@python.org> <9d2a0934-bf26-42a8-9bb2-e4e75b2d2ad3@googlegroups.com> <CAPTjJmq+VKdu7x_nzfP8fb=0EiAqWJO6_qKNsabQSnbBStyMsA@mail.gmail.com> <1468652038.1427719.667878897.460955C0@webmail.messagingengine.com> <mailman.28.1468652041.2307.python-list@python.org> <578a027c$0$1616$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <69d8d886-c18a-4c05-8bca-9a05afacd9a9@googlegroups.com> <578ca188$0$1505$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <877fcjcllf.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <CAPTjJmqYuhfR68g4EWWfj=GQSQMBmo3r3DRCej39xLtjPfR2ow@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.71.1468836914.2307.python-list@python.org> <578da1b5$0$1591$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <d0d6f677-35d0-4c79-a281-44317bbc11dd@googlegroups.com> <578f0f5c$0$11115$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> <578F23A9.7070105@rece.vub.ac.be> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=utf-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | news.uni-berlin.de aEK5pwqyDI6nMc5mTy60CgDHYM05tNai2oqtiJQDN8xw== |
| Return-Path | <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.024 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.95; '*S*': 0.00; 'received:134': 0.05; '"but': 0.09; '1.0)': 0.09; 'none.': 0.09; 'rounding': 0.09; 'appropriate': 0.14; 'subject: \n ': 0.15; 'fuzzy': 0.16; 'integers.': 0.16; 'received:ac.be': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'subject:Singleton': 0.16; 'too?': 0.16; 'integer': 0.18; 'arguments': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'all.': 0.24; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; "doesn't": 0.26; 'example': 0.26; 'error': 0.27; '(e.g.': 0.27; '(such': 0.27; '2.0': 0.27; 'values': 0.28; 'arithmetic': 0.29; 'equality': 0.29; 'subject: [': 0.29; 'programmers': 0.30; 'received:be': 0.30; 'waste': 0.30; 'operations': 0.31; "can't": 0.32; 'point': 0.33; 'steven': 0.33; 'fail': 0.35; 'mix': 0.35; "isn't": 0.35; 'sometimes': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'there': 0.36; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'really': 0.37; 'doing': 0.38; 'why': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'some': 0.40; 'forget': 0.60; 'your': 0.60; 'no.': 0.62; 'limit': 0.65; 'results': 0.66; 'carefully': 0.72; 'calculations': 0.84; "d'aprano:": 0.84; 'maths': 0.84; 'schreef': 0.84; 'spite': 0.84; 'do:': 0.91 |
| X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered | true |
| X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result | ArIIAHYeUleGuA9G/2dsb2JhbABehFsBvRCGEgKCAAEBAQEBAWaEbQEBAwEjVQYLCxoCBRYLAgIJAwIBAgFFEwgCiCMIsU2NPoNbAQEIAiWBAYUmhE2EHW+CNYI9HAEEmEWBV4oRgjyCAIczhWmPUlSCOYE3iTuBQwEBAQ |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.8.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <578f0f5c$0$11115$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.22 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID | <578F23A9.7070105@rece.vub.ac.be> |
| X-Mailman-Original-References | <nlmpl5$9l4$1@dont-email.me> <nm6kbb$t6b$1@ger.gmane.org> <mailman.51.1468454075.21009.python-list@python.org> <7046c74e-e5ea-4dde-8847-8c556756a563@googlegroups.com> <5789B601.9000604@stoneleaf.us> <mailman.26.1468642801.2307.python-list@python.org> <9d2a0934-bf26-42a8-9bb2-e4e75b2d2ad3@googlegroups.com> <CAPTjJmq+VKdu7x_nzfP8fb=0EiAqWJO6_qKNsabQSnbBStyMsA@mail.gmail.com> <1468652038.1427719.667878897.460955C0@webmail.messagingengine.com> <mailman.28.1468652041.2307.python-list@python.org> <578a027c$0$1616$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <69d8d886-c18a-4c05-8bca-9a05afacd9a9@googlegroups.com> <578ca188$0$1505$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <877fcjcllf.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <CAPTjJmqYuhfR68g4EWWfj=GQSQMBmo3r3DRCej39xLtjPfR2ow@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.71.1468836914.2307.python-list@python.org> <578da1b5$0$1591$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <d0d6f677-35d0-4c79-a281-44317bbc11dd@googlegroups.com> <578f0f5c$0$11115$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> |
| X-Received-Bytes | 6502 |
| X-Received-Body-CRC | 3926477562 |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:111661 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Op 20-07-16 om 07:42 schreef Steven D'Aprano: > Floating point maths is hard, thinking carefully about what you are doing and > whether it is appropriate to use == or a fuzzy almost-equal comparison, or if > equality is the right way at all. > > "But thinking is hard, can't you just tell me the answer?" > > No. But I can give some guidelines: > > Floating point arithmetic is deterministic, it doesn't just randomly mix in > error out of spite or malice. So in principle, you can always estimate the > rounding error from any calculation -- and sometimes there is none. I would like to see a practical example of such an outcome. > Arithmetic on integer-values (e.g. 1.0) is always exact, up to a limit of > either 2**53 or approximately 1e53, I forget which. (That's why most Javascript > programmers fail to notice that they don't have an integer type.) So long as > you're using operations that only produce integer values from integer arguments > (such as + - * // but not / ) then all calculations are exact. It is a waste of > time to do: > > x = 2.0 > y = x*1002.0 > is_equal(y, 2004.0, 1e-16) > > when you can just do y == 2004.0. But why perforem integer arithmetics in floats, isn't that a waste of time too? I really see no reason to use floats if you know all your results will be integers. -- Antoon.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Clean Singleton Docstrings Rob Gaddi <rgaddi@highlandtechnology.invalid> - 2016-07-07 23:46 +0000
Re: Clean Singleton Docstrings Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-08 12:53 +1000
Re: Clean Singleton Docstrings Michael Selik <michael.selik@gmail.com> - 2016-07-07 23:43 -0400
Re: Clean Singleton Docstrings Rob Gaddi <rgaddi@highlandtechnology.invalid> - 2016-07-08 16:57 +0000
Re: Clean Singleton Docstrings Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2016-07-08 13:00 -0700
Re: Clean Singleton Docstrings Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2016-07-08 09:38 +0200
Re: Clean Singleton Docstrings Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-08 19:20 +1000
Re: Clean Singleton Docstrings Rob Gaddi <rgaddi@highlandtechnology.invalid> - 2016-07-08 16:47 +0000
Re: Clean Singleton Docstrings Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-07-13 15:42 -0700
Re: Clean Singleton Docstrings Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2016-07-14 01:54 +0200
Re: Clean Singleton Docstrings Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-15 21:04 -0700
Re: Clean Singleton Docstrings Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2016-07-15 21:20 -0700
Re: Clean Singleton Docstrings Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-15 22:51 -0700
Re: Clean Singleton Docstrings Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-07-15 23:19 -0700
Re: Clean Singleton Docstrings Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-16 16:29 +1000
Re: Clean Singleton Docstrings Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-07-16 02:53 -0400
Re: Clean Singleton Docstrings Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-16 18:54 +1000
Re: Clean Singleton Docstrings Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-16 19:46 +1000
What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings) Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-17 21:16 -0700
Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-18 14:35 +1000
Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings) Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-17 22:37 -0700
Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-18 15:48 +1000
Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings) Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-07-18 09:21 +0300
Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings) Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-07-18 09:32 -0400
Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings) Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2016-07-18 14:46 +1000
Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings) Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-17 22:22 -0700
Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings) Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-18 19:29 +1000
Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings) Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-07-18 13:00 +0300
Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-18 20:15 +1000
Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings) Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-18 03:24 -0700
Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-18 20:37 +1000
Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings) Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-07-18 14:38 +0300
Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings) Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2016-07-18 14:58 +0200
Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings) Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-19 13:42 +1000
Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings) Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-18 21:58 -0700
Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-19 15:30 +1000
Floating point equality [was Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings)] Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-20 15:42 +1000
Re: Floating point equality [was Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings)] Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 16:11 +1000
Re: Floating point equality [was Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings)] Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2016-07-20 09:09 +0200
Re: Floating point equality [was Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings)] Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-07-20 10:25 +0300
Re: Floating point equality [was Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings)] Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-20 22:47 +1000
Re: Floating point equality [was Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings)] Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-07-20 16:54 +0300
Re: Floating point equality [was Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings)] Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 00:26 +1000
Re: Floating point equality [was Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings)] Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-07-20 17:59 +0300
Re: Floating point equality [was Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings)] Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 22:38 -0700
Re: Floating point equality [was Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings)] Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-07-21 10:52 +0300
Re: Floating point equality [was Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings)] Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 18:46 +1000
Re: Floating point equality [was Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings)] Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-07-21 12:09 +0300
Re: Floating point equality [was Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings)] Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-07-22 00:54 +0100
Re: Floating point equality [was Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings)] Chris Kaynor <ckaynor@zindagigames.com> - 2016-07-21 17:43 -0700
Re: Floating point equality [was Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings)] Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-07-22 17:14 +0100
Re: Floating point equality [was Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings)] Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 22:28 -0700
Re: Floating point equality [was Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings)] Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 15:35 +1000
Re: Floating point equality [was Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings)] Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 22:52 -0700
Re: Floating point equality [was Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings)] Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-21 16:34 +1000
Re: Floating point equality [was Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings)] Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 06:14 -0700
Re: Floating point equality [was Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings)] Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-22 02:10 +1000
Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-19 15:27 +1000
Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings) Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-18 03:14 -0700
Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings) Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-07-18 09:25 -0600
Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings) Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-07-18 18:40 +0300
Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings) Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-07-18 18:55 +0300
Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings) Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-07-18 11:13 -0600
Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings) Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-07-18 21:58 +0300
Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings) Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-18 17:36 -0700
Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings) Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-19 13:16 +1000
Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings) Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-18 20:26 -0700
Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings) Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-07-19 01:22 -0400
Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-07-19 10:46 -0700
Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings) Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-07-19 16:35 -0400
Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings) Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-07-20 01:17 +0300
Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings) Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-07-19 23:15 -0400
Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings) Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-07-20 10:16 +0300
Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings) Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-07-20 10:00 -0400
Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings) Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2016-07-21 10:46 +1200
Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings) Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-07-19 16:27 -0600
Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings) Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-07-20 02:09 +0300
Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings) alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2016-07-20 13:24 +0000
Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings) Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-21 14:04 +1000
Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-07-19 17:01 -0700
Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings) Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2016-07-20 11:07 +1200
Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings) Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-07-20 02:20 +0300
Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings) Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-19 13:03 +1000
Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings) Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-07-18 09:25 -0400
Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings) Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-19 13:21 +1000
Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings) Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2016-07-19 10:21 +1000
Re: Clean Singleton Docstrings Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-16 17:27 +1000
Re: Clean Singleton Docstrings Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-07-16 10:58 +0300
Re: Clean Singleton Docstrings Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-07-16 14:04 -0400
Re: Clean Singleton Docstrings Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-07-16 21:43 +0300
Re: Clean Singleton Docstrings Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-17 07:02 +1000
Re: Clean Singleton Docstrings Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-07-17 00:27 +0300
Re: Clean Singleton Docstrings Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-17 08:18 +1000
Re: Clean Singleton Docstrings Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-07-17 10:41 +0300
Re: Clean Singleton Docstrings Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-17 17:51 +1000
Re: Clean Singleton Docstrings Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-07-17 04:03 -0400
Re: Clean Singleton Docstrings Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-07-17 20:35 +1000
Re: Clean Singleton Docstrings Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-07-17 04:08 -0400
Re: Clean Singleton Docstrings Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-07-17 18:44 +1000
Re: Clean Singleton Docstrings Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-07-13 18:25 -0600
Re: Clean Singleton Docstrings Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2016-07-08 09:44 +0200
Re: Clean Singleton Docstrings Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-07-08 01:53 -0700
Re: What exactly is "exact" (was Clean Singleton Docstrings) Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-07-19 23:16 -0400
csiph-web