Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #101184

Re: We will be moving to GitHub

Path csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.freenet.ag!newsfeed.kamp.net!newsfeed.kamp.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: We will be moving to GitHub
Date Sat, 02 Jan 2016 20:31:20 -0700
Lines 13
Message-ID <mailman.190.1451791884.11925.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
References <n66kmg$ig$1@ger.gmane.org> <CAPTjJmq1Qevy7h4pqrQPobLRO-_ooLrXsZhK9Z9YCKPyFnxKsQ@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.144.1451678342.11925.python-list@python.org> <87si2hdoq3.fsf@jester.gateway.pace.com> <CAKJDb-MSkTStMvyRHhGiidwUbew-uPz17MsFZiYFHe5btb5Fdg@mail.gmail.com> <8560zcsbuu.fsf@benfinney.id.au>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
X-Trace news.uni-berlin.de nM8rLks81031g3lpAo8hkAwA4SvkmJMRx80S50vC8VFA==
Return-Path <torriem+gmail@torriefamily.org>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.061
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.88; '*S*': 0.00; 'git': 0.09; 'from:addr:torriem': 0.16; 'from:name:michael torrie': 0.16; 'really?': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'url.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'am,': 0.23; 'seems': 0.23; 'proprietary': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.26; 'common': 0.33; 'requirement.': 0.33; 'message- id:@gmail.com': 0.34; 'done': 0.35; 'submitting': 0.35; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'being': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.37; 'why': 0.39; 'submit': 0.39; 'received:192': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'within': 0.64; 'unacceptable': 0.84; 'absolutely': 0.88; 'response,': 0.95
X-Virus-Scanned amavisd-new at torriefamily.org
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
In-Reply-To <8560zcsbuu.fsf@benfinney.id.au>
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.20+
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:101184

Show key headers only | View raw

On 01/02/2016 12:02 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
> What is being done to stave off the common response, addressed by GitHub
> users to people submitting a change as a link to their Git repository,
> of “can you please submit that as a GitHub pull request”?
> 
> That common response makes for an unnecessary and IMO unacceptable
> pressure toward centralisation. GitHub's “pull request” workflow is
> entirely proprietary and can only be done within GitHub.

Really?  This seems like an entirely artificial github requirement.
There's absolutely no reason why github couldn't do a pull request from
any arbitrary, valid git url.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: We will be moving to GitHub Zachary Ware <zachary.ware+pylist@gmail.com> - 2016-01-01 13:58 -0600
  Re: We will be moving to GitHub Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-01 12:33 -0800
    Re: We will be moving to GitHub Zachary Ware <zachary.ware+pylist@gmail.com> - 2016-01-01 14:46 -0600
      Re: We will be moving to GitHub Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-01 13:19 -0800
    Re: We will be moving to GitHub Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2016-01-02 18:02 +1100
    Re: We will be moving to GitHub Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 20:31 -0700
    GitHub's “pull request” is proprietary lock-in (was: We will be moving to GitHub) Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2016-01-03 15:43 +1100
      Re: GitHub's ³pull request² is proprietary lock-in (was: We will be moving to GitHub) Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> - 2016-01-02 20:56 -0800
        Re: GitHub's ³pull request² is proprietary lock-in Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-01-03 02:04 -0500
          Re: GitHub's ³pull request² is proprietary lock-in Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2016-01-03 08:44 +0100
            Re: GitHub's ³pull request² is proprietary lock-in Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2016-01-03 19:03 +1100
              Re: GitHub's ³pull request² is proprietary lock-in Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2016-01-03 09:33 +0100
                Re: GitHub's ³pull request² is proprietary lock-in Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2016-01-03 19:45 +1100
                Re: GitHub's ³pull request² is proprietary lock-in Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-01-03 20:18 +1100
                Re: GitHub's ³pull request² is proprietary lock-in Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-01-03 04:31 -0500
                Re: GitHub's ³pull request² is proprietary lock-in Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-03 01:50 -0800
                Re: [python] Re: GitHub's ³pull request² is proprietary lock-in "W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us> - 2016-01-03 01:42 -0800
                Re: GitHub's ³pull request² is proprietary lock-in Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2016-01-03 20:46 +1100
                Re: GitHub's ³pull request² is proprietary lock-in Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-01-03 21:17 +1100
                Re: GitHub's ³pull request² is proprietary lock-in Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-01-03 21:24 +1100
                Re: GitHub's ³pull request² is proprietary lock-in Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-03 02:42 -0800
                Re: GitHub's ³pull request² is proprietary lock-in Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-01-03 23:33 +1100
                Re: GitHub's ³pull request² is proprietary lock-in Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-03 21:29 -0800
                Re: GitHub's ³pull request² is proprietary lock-in Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2016-01-04 08:02 +0100
          Re: GitHub's ©¯pull request©— is proprietary lock-in Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> - 2016-01-03 12:51 -0800
        Re: GitHub's �pull request� is proprietary lock-in Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2016-01-03 08:05 -0700
        Re: GitHub's �pull request� is proprietary lock-in Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2016-01-03 08:14 -0700
      Re: GitHub's “pull request” is proprietary lock-in Kevin Walzer <kw@codebykevin.com> - 2016-01-03 16:58 -0500
      Re: GitHub's “pull request” is proprietary lock-in m <mvoicem@gmail.com> - 2016-01-04 11:21 +0100
        Re: GitHub's “pull request” is proprietary lock-in Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2016-01-04 10:41 -0700
          Re: GitHub's "pull request" is proprietary lock-in Josef Pktd <josef.pktd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-04 13:29 -0800
          Re: GitHub's “pull request” is proprietary lock-in m <mvoicem@gmail.com> - 2016-01-05 01:24 +0100
    Re: GitHub's “pull request” is proprietary lock-in Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-01-03 19:51 -0500
    Re: GitHub's “pull request” is proprietary lock-in Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2016-01-03 21:16 -0700
    Re: GitHub's “pull request” is proprietary lock-in Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-01-03 23:58 -0500

csiph-web