Path: csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.freenet.ag!newsfeed.kamp.net!newsfeed.kamp.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Michael Torrie Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: We will be moving to GitHub Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2016 20:31:20 -0700 Lines: 13 Message-ID: References: <87si2hdoq3.fsf@jester.gateway.pace.com> <8560zcsbuu.fsf@benfinney.id.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de nM8rLks81031g3lpAo8hkAwA4SvkmJMRx80S50vC8VFA== Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.061 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.88; '*S*': 0.00; 'git': 0.09; 'from:addr:torriem': 0.16; 'from:name:michael torrie': 0.16; 'really?': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'url.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'am,': 0.23; 'seems': 0.23; 'proprietary': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.26; 'common': 0.33; 'requirement.': 0.33; 'message- id:@gmail.com': 0.34; 'done': 0.35; 'submitting': 0.35; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'being': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.37; 'why': 0.39; 'submit': 0.39; 'received:192': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'within': 0.64; 'unacceptable': 0.84; 'absolutely': 0.88; 'response,': 0.95 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at torriefamily.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 In-Reply-To: <8560zcsbuu.fsf@benfinney.id.au> X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20+ Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:101184 On 01/02/2016 12:02 AM, Ben Finney wrote: > What is being done to stave off the common response, addressed by GitHub > users to people submitting a change as a link to their Git repository, > of “can you please submit that as a GitHub pull request”? > > That common response makes for an unnecessary and IMO unacceptable > pressure toward centralisation. GitHub's “pull request” workflow is > entirely proprietary and can only be done within GitHub. Really? This seems like an entirely artificial github requirement. There's absolutely no reason why github couldn't do a pull request from any arbitrary, valid git url.