Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #101113
| From | Zachary Ware <zachary.ware+pylist@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: We will be moving to GitHub |
| Date | 2016-01-01 13:58 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.144.1451678342.11925.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| References | <n66kmg$ig$1@ger.gmane.org> <CAPTjJmq1Qevy7h4pqrQPobLRO-_ooLrXsZhK9Z9YCKPyFnxKsQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On Jan 1, 2016 1:47 PM, "Chris Angelico" <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 6:39 AM, Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > > Please see > > https://mail.python.org/pipermail/core-workflow/2016-January/000345.html > > > > This should encourage developers at all levels to help out, such that the > > list of open issues on the bug tracker falls drastically. > > How does that interact with the still-Draft status of PEP 481? The > email seems to mainly be saying "not GitLab", but until PEP 481 is > accepted, I'm not certain that GitHub is accepted either. > > It's not entirely clear whether that message is an acceptance of PEP 481 or not. I've lost track of the pep numbers, but Brett's decision is final; the canonical CPython repository will be moving to GitHub in the near future. Note that we will *not* be using the GitHub issue tracker or wiki, just the hosting and review/pull request system. There are still several details to be worked out, though. -- Zach (On a phone)
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: We will be moving to GitHub Zachary Ware <zachary.ware+pylist@gmail.com> - 2016-01-01 13:58 -0600
Re: We will be moving to GitHub Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-01 12:33 -0800
Re: We will be moving to GitHub Zachary Ware <zachary.ware+pylist@gmail.com> - 2016-01-01 14:46 -0600
Re: We will be moving to GitHub Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-01 13:19 -0800
Re: We will be moving to GitHub Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2016-01-02 18:02 +1100
Re: We will be moving to GitHub Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 20:31 -0700
GitHub's “pull request” is proprietary lock-in (was: We will be moving to GitHub) Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2016-01-03 15:43 +1100
Re: GitHub's ³pull request² is proprietary lock-in (was: We will be moving to GitHub) Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> - 2016-01-02 20:56 -0800
Re: GitHub's ³pull request² is proprietary lock-in Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-01-03 02:04 -0500
Re: GitHub's ³pull request² is proprietary lock-in Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2016-01-03 08:44 +0100
Re: GitHub's ³pull request² is proprietary lock-in Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2016-01-03 19:03 +1100
Re: GitHub's ³pull request² is proprietary lock-in Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2016-01-03 09:33 +0100
Re: GitHub's ³pull request² is proprietary lock-in Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2016-01-03 19:45 +1100
Re: GitHub's ³pull request² is proprietary lock-in Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-01-03 20:18 +1100
Re: GitHub's ³pull request² is proprietary lock-in Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-01-03 04:31 -0500
Re: GitHub's ³pull request² is proprietary lock-in Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-03 01:50 -0800
Re: [python] Re: GitHub's ³pull request² is proprietary lock-in "W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us> - 2016-01-03 01:42 -0800
Re: GitHub's ³pull request² is proprietary lock-in Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2016-01-03 20:46 +1100
Re: GitHub's ³pull request² is proprietary lock-in Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-01-03 21:17 +1100
Re: GitHub's ³pull request² is proprietary lock-in Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-01-03 21:24 +1100
Re: GitHub's ³pull request² is proprietary lock-in Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-03 02:42 -0800
Re: GitHub's ³pull request² is proprietary lock-in Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-01-03 23:33 +1100
Re: GitHub's ³pull request² is proprietary lock-in Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-03 21:29 -0800
Re: GitHub's ³pull request² is proprietary lock-in Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2016-01-04 08:02 +0100
Re: GitHub's ©¯pull request© is proprietary lock-in Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> - 2016-01-03 12:51 -0800
Re: GitHub's �pull request� is proprietary lock-in Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2016-01-03 08:05 -0700
Re: GitHub's �pull request� is proprietary lock-in Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2016-01-03 08:14 -0700
Re: GitHub's “pull request” is proprietary lock-in Kevin Walzer <kw@codebykevin.com> - 2016-01-03 16:58 -0500
Re: GitHub's “pull request” is proprietary lock-in m <mvoicem@gmail.com> - 2016-01-04 11:21 +0100
Re: GitHub's “pull request” is proprietary lock-in Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2016-01-04 10:41 -0700
Re: GitHub's "pull request" is proprietary lock-in Josef Pktd <josef.pktd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-04 13:29 -0800
Re: GitHub's “pull request” is proprietary lock-in m <mvoicem@gmail.com> - 2016-01-05 01:24 +0100
Re: GitHub's “pull request” is proprietary lock-in Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-01-03 19:51 -0500
Re: GitHub's “pull request” is proprietary lock-in Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2016-01-03 21:16 -0700
Re: GitHub's “pull request” is proprietary lock-in Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-01-03 23:58 -0500
csiph-web