Re: hash values and equality

Path	csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path	<ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.018
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 0.96; 'S': 0.00; 'though.': 0.07; 'python': 0.08; 'hash': 0.09; 'am,': 0.14; 'wrote:': 0.14; 'cpython,': 0.16; 'dummy': 0.16; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.21; 'fri,': 0.23; 'received:209.85.161.46': 0.23; 'received:mail- fx0-f46.google.com': 0.23; 'code': 0.24; 'values': 0.25; 'received:209.85.161': 0.26; "i'm": 0.27; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.28; 'equal': 0.31; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'actually': 0.33; '(for': 0.33; 'question': 0.34; 'chris': 0.34; 'received:google.com': 0.37; 'received:209.85': 0.37; '20,': 0.37; 'checks': 0.37; 'think': 0.38; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'received:209': 0.39; 'containing': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'ever': 0.64; '10:36': 0.84
DKIM-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=hsQ0gStoV+USAkU00lz5aA768gGMk2PJjlriuW5sUxU=; b=GBNSrNC0GexEatX8p+VdJg1P0XK8Xc3eedzW5ALyeHmF41qofEDOzeJOokMnmiscf8 y4I0UGGOLKd5hnCGAJhEqLb6tF3jbS+kD6oEsQaqBC6UprOvJ+EbiRWQOtAAKRKxl4fl QT5RygZRvlspOJG956h9NMo+UGxkJuhnt2rZo=
DomainKey-Signature	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=YJ11OTNLxdpYqrRhhqbDHq+sipWFYbfEISbQrGBBxvRZt/od/OLbUzTmVQmfhmykOC TfN0JjZa16Kcoj4CIam8hl+s0MIDwhor5QttyqT+VF2HGhtfKFckKmv816hw9YPo3bh1 wbGP9bu3qHmYdB4T59dZgm0WN0cpf/PlhdvLU=
MIME-Version	1.0
In-Reply-To	<BANLkTimXgEsyco6tDZhiPf_MLY9EQOADxw@mail.gmail.com>
References	<4DD2C2A5.3080403@stoneleaf.us> <BANLkTimvzZeN5dmm2xHP5xV8Kpw2Nb9kuQ@mail.gmail.com> <4DD2D89D.4000303@stoneleaf.us> <BANLkTintqgBLFtBx8+1b+R10nywuKdKHOw@mail.gmail.com> <4DD2F661.2050005@stoneleaf.us> <BANLkTikx8U4jWwLXXazpmtsL6MasDmyVyg@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=_GqrNntRU7pv7x=kj3gHurk-Gaw@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.1822.1305870290.9059.python-list@python.org> <0deha8-6u9.ln1@satorlaser.homedns.org> <4DD68DAA.9050209@mrabarnett.plus.com> <BANLkTin7E_xsoe5UtGHquHGjkcy82fAOJw@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTimXgEsyco6tDZhiPf_MLY9EQOADxw@mail.gmail.com>
From	Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
Date	Fri, 20 May 2011 11:59:44 -0600
Subject	Re: hash values and equality
To	Python <python-list@python.org>
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.12
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.1848.1305914416.9059.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines	11
NNTP-Posting-Host	82.94.164.166
X-Trace	1305914417 news.xs4all.nl 49177 [::ffff:82.94.164.166]:49837
X-Complaints-To	abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref	x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:5866

Show key headers only | View raw

On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Chris Kaynor <ckaynor@zindagigames.com> wrote:
> I think the question was: can this dummy code ever produce a set containing
> less then itemCount items (for 0 < itemCount < 2**32)?

In CPython, no.  Even when you get a hash collision, the code checks
to see whether the hashes are actually equal before it calls the rich
comparison, the former check being a much faster operation since the
hash values are cached.

I'm not sure whether this can be counted on for all Python
implementations, though.

Thread

hash values and equality Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-05-19 22:43 -0700
  Re: hash values and equality Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2011-05-20 08:38 +0200
    Re: hash values and equality Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-05-20 10:57 -0700
    Re: hash values and equality Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2011-05-20 22:25 +0200
    Re: hash values and equality Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-05-20 14:48 -0700
  Re: hash values and equality Ulrich Eckhardt <ulrich.eckhardt@dominolaser.com> - 2011-05-20 08:33 +0200
    Re: hash values and equality MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2011-05-20 16:50 +0100
    Re: hash values and equality Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-05-21 02:20 +1000
    Re: hash values and equality Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-05-20 11:59 -0600
    Re: hash values and equality Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-05-20 11:38 -0700
      Re: hash values and equality Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2011-05-21 20:24 +1200
        Re: hash values and equality Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2011-05-21 11:24 +0200
    Re: hash values and equality Christian Heimes <lists@cheimes.de> - 2011-05-20 21:01 +0200
    Re: hash values and equality MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2011-05-20 21:17 +0100
      Re: hash values and equality Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-05-21 00:47 +0000
        Re: hash values and equality MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2011-05-21 02:02 +0100
          Re: hash values and equality Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-05-21 01:55 +0000
    Re: hash values and equality John Nagle <nagle@animats.com> - 2011-05-21 15:55 -0700
      Re: hash values and equality Irmen de Jong <irmen.NOSPAM@xs4all.nl> - 2011-05-22 01:07 +0200
      Re: hash values and equality Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-05-22 00:24 +0000

csiph-web