Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #5863
| Date | 2011-05-20 10:57 -0700 |
|---|---|
| From | Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> |
| Subject | Re: hash values and equality |
| References | (4 earlier) <4DD2F661.2050005@stoneleaf.us> <BANLkTikx8U4jWwLXXazpmtsL6MasDmyVyg@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=_GqrNntRU7pv7x=kj3gHurk-Gaw@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.1822.1305870290.9059.python-list@python.org> <ir5292$3md$1@solani.org> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1846.1305913522.9059.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
Peter Otten wrote:
> Ethan Furman wrote:
>
>> Several folk have said that objects that compare equal must hash equal,
>> and the docs also state this
>> http://docs.python.org/dev/reference/datamodel.html#object.__hash__
>>
>> I'm hoping somebody can tell me what horrible thing will happen if this
>> isn't the case? Here's a toy example of a class I'm thinking of writing
>> that will compare equal with int's, but hash differently:
>>
>> --> class Wierd():
>> ... def __init__(self, value):
>> ... self.value = value
>> ... def __eq__(self, other):
>> ... return self.value == other
>> ... def __hash__(self):
>> ... return hash((self.value + 13) ** 3)
>> ...
>
> Try this:
>
>>>> d = {Wierd(1): 0}
>>>> 1 in d
> False
>>>> 1 in d.keys()
> True
>
My apologies -- I'm trying this in Python3:
--> two in d
True
--> two in d.keys()
True
-->
--> 2 in d
True
--> 2 in d.keys()
True
~Ethan~
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
hash values and equality Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-05-19 22:43 -0700
Re: hash values and equality Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2011-05-20 08:38 +0200
Re: hash values and equality Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-05-20 10:57 -0700
Re: hash values and equality Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2011-05-20 22:25 +0200
Re: hash values and equality Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-05-20 14:48 -0700
Re: hash values and equality Ulrich Eckhardt <ulrich.eckhardt@dominolaser.com> - 2011-05-20 08:33 +0200
Re: hash values and equality MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2011-05-20 16:50 +0100
Re: hash values and equality Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-05-21 02:20 +1000
Re: hash values and equality Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-05-20 11:59 -0600
Re: hash values and equality Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-05-20 11:38 -0700
Re: hash values and equality Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2011-05-21 20:24 +1200
Re: hash values and equality Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2011-05-21 11:24 +0200
Re: hash values and equality Christian Heimes <lists@cheimes.de> - 2011-05-20 21:01 +0200
Re: hash values and equality MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2011-05-20 21:17 +0100
Re: hash values and equality Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-05-21 00:47 +0000
Re: hash values and equality MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2011-05-21 02:02 +0100
Re: hash values and equality Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-05-21 01:55 +0000
Re: hash values and equality John Nagle <nagle@animats.com> - 2011-05-21 15:55 -0700
Re: hash values and equality Irmen de Jong <irmen.NOSPAM@xs4all.nl> - 2011-05-22 01:07 +0200
Re: hash values and equality Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-05-22 00:24 +0000
csiph-web