Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #5868
| Date | 2011-05-20 11:38 -0700 |
|---|---|
| From | Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> |
| Subject | Re: hash values and equality |
| References | (4 earlier) <4DD2F661.2050005@stoneleaf.us> <BANLkTikx8U4jWwLXXazpmtsL6MasDmyVyg@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=_GqrNntRU7pv7x=kj3gHurk-Gaw@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.1822.1305870290.9059.python-list@python.org> <0deha8-6u9.ln1@satorlaser.homedns.org> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1850.1305915987.9059.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
Ulrich Eckhardt wrote: > Ethan Furman wrote: >> Several folk have said that objects that compare equal must hash equal, >> and the docs also state this >> http://docs.python.org/dev/reference/datamodel.html#object.__hash__ >> >> I'm hoping somebody can tell me what horrible thing will happen if this >> isn't the case? > > If you were familiar with what a hash map is, you wouldn't ask. The thing is > that the hash is used to look up the place in the map where the thing is > stored. If two equal objects have different hashes, they will be stored in > different places in the hash map. Looking for object1 will then not turn up > with object2, even though they are equal. In this case this is the behavior I want. > If this is something you don't > care about, and all you care about is identity, then I'd derive the hash > from each object's ID. This won't work, as objects of the same type that compare equal should (and do, in my code) hash equal. > This ID has another property which is something that is assumed for hashes, > and your code seems a bit to get that wrong, too, and that is that the hash > must not change. The hash does not change on the instances, and is the same for all instances of my type that compare equal. ~Ethan~
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
hash values and equality Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-05-19 22:43 -0700
Re: hash values and equality Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2011-05-20 08:38 +0200
Re: hash values and equality Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-05-20 10:57 -0700
Re: hash values and equality Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2011-05-20 22:25 +0200
Re: hash values and equality Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-05-20 14:48 -0700
Re: hash values and equality Ulrich Eckhardt <ulrich.eckhardt@dominolaser.com> - 2011-05-20 08:33 +0200
Re: hash values and equality MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2011-05-20 16:50 +0100
Re: hash values and equality Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-05-21 02:20 +1000
Re: hash values and equality Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-05-20 11:59 -0600
Re: hash values and equality Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-05-20 11:38 -0700
Re: hash values and equality Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2011-05-21 20:24 +1200
Re: hash values and equality Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2011-05-21 11:24 +0200
Re: hash values and equality Christian Heimes <lists@cheimes.de> - 2011-05-20 21:01 +0200
Re: hash values and equality MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2011-05-20 21:17 +0100
Re: hash values and equality Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-05-21 00:47 +0000
Re: hash values and equality MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2011-05-21 02:02 +0100
Re: hash values and equality Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-05-21 01:55 +0000
Re: hash values and equality John Nagle <nagle@animats.com> - 2011-05-21 15:55 -0700
Re: hash values and equality Irmen de Jong <irmen.NOSPAM@xs4all.nl> - 2011-05-22 01:07 +0200
Re: hash values and equality Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-05-22 00:24 +0000
csiph-web