Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #84085
| Date | 2015-01-20 12:15 -0800 |
|---|---|
| From | Ken Seehart <ken@seehart.com> |
| Subject | Re: Trees |
| References | <CAG=hEY1L-39EmuWpdEh_n-BNfs=qG9nL=MrMT0ar72yGBrkoUA@mail.gmail.com> <m9k2cs$pk$1@ger.gmane.org> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.17897.1421784898.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
Exactly. There are over 23,000 different kinds of trees. There's no way you could get all of them to fit in a library, especially a standard one. Instead, we prefer to provide people with the tools they need to grow their own trees. http://caseytrees.org/programs/planting/ctp/ http://www.ncsu.edu/project/treesofstrength/treefact.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tree On 1/19/2015 3:01 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote: > On 19/01/2015 22:06, Zachary Gilmartin wrote: >> Why aren't there trees in the python standard library? >> > > Probably because you'd never get agreement as to which specific tree > and which specific implementation was the most suitable for inclusion. >
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Trees Ken Seehart <ken@seehart.com> - 2015-01-20 12:15 -0800
csiph-web