Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.010 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'tree': 0.05; 'lawrence': 0.09; 'library?': 0.09; 'trees': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; '22:06,': 0.16; 'received:192.168.1.20': 0.16; 'received:74.55.86': 0.16; 'received:74.55.86.74': 0.16; 'received:smtp.webfaction.com': 0.16; 'received:webfaction.com': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'fit': 0.20; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; "aren't": 0.24; 'library,': 0.24; 'url:edu': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'especially': 0.30; 'url:wiki': 0.31; 'url:wikipedia': 0.31; 'probably': 0.32; 'could': 0.34; 'there': 0.35; 'url:org': 0.36; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'most': 0.60; 'provide': 0.64; 'different': 0.65; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.65; 'url:htm': 0.73; 'grow': 0.77 Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 12:15:01 -0800 From: Ken Seehart User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: Trees References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 18 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1421784898 news.xs4all.nl 2941 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:52842 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:84085 Exactly. There are over 23,000 different kinds of trees. There's no way you could get all of them to fit in a library, especially a standard one. Instead, we prefer to provide people with the tools they need to grow their own trees. http://caseytrees.org/programs/planting/ctp/ http://www.ncsu.edu/project/treesofstrength/treefact.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tree On 1/19/2015 3:01 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote: > On 19/01/2015 22:06, Zachary Gilmartin wrote: >> Why aren't there trees in the python standard library? >> > > Probably because you'd never get agreement as to which specific tree > and which specific implementation was the most suitable for inclusion. >