Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #84085 > unrolled thread

Re: Trees

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Trees Ken Seehart <ken@seehart.com> - 2015-01-20 12:15 -0800

#84085 — Re: Trees

Exactly. There are over 23,000 different kinds of trees. There's no way 
you could get all of them to fit in a library, especially a standard 
one. Instead, we prefer to provide people with the tools they need to 
grow their own trees.

http://caseytrees.org/programs/planting/ctp/
http://www.ncsu.edu/project/treesofstrength/treefact.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tree

On 1/19/2015 3:01 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 19/01/2015 22:06, Zachary Gilmartin wrote:
>> Why aren't there trees in the python standard library?
>>
>
> Probably because you'd never get agreement as to which specific tree 
> and which specific implementation was the most suitable for inclusion.
>

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python

csiph-web