Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #106025
| Path | csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: Threading is foobared? |
| Date | Tue, 29 Mar 2016 23:34:26 -0400 |
| Lines | 14 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.175.1459308868.28225.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| References | <56f74d00$0$1620$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <ndf4k7$jn0$1@dont-email.me> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | news.uni-berlin.de EMKRYUTibUxuwJ5cvhQHXwwabvUauO2V5waj4xSHZezQ== |
| Return-Path | <random832@fastmail.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.002 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'broken': 0.03; 'sufficient': 0.05; 'received:internal': 0.09; 'thread': 0.10; '(but': 0.15; 'fine).': 0.16; 'message- id:@webmail.messagingengine.com': 0.16; 'places.': 0.16; 'received:10.202': 0.16; 'received:10.202.2': 0.16; 'received:10.202.2.212': 0.16; 'received:66.111': 0.16; 'received:66.111.4': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:messagingengine.com': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'stuff)': 0.16; 'threading': 0.16; 'usenet': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'case.': 0.18; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'wonder': 0.27; 'everyone': 0.31; 'tue,': 0.34; 'list': 0.34; 'list,': 0.36; 'instead': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'received:10': 0.37; 'list.': 0.37; 'received:66': 0.38; 'mailing': 0.38; 'why': 0.39; 'rather': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'header:Message-Id:1': 0.61; 'different': 0.63; 'mar': 0.65; 'counts': 0.81; 'everywhere.': 0.84 |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=WP8Q+WINaA0o9BZqGYXNvlHFwSE=; b=xZFjgR 7G0Gto14VYFlNzsvmOpT3MhMa+MLgs9S8RGx6XLvnmZDthmY16+qUTYIx4cTZSNL cuy0/j5TpF3IdR0S4LzdfdAneSWUre1D6dU8kH+FrRZ2aXcWarlBloMQfqct/CQW AQQM+mYelMuIkSYutr0/XJjVvb2F/70XLiRlc= |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=WP8Q+WINaA0o9BZ qGYXNvlHFwSE=; b=dcO9Bk+YIK63kNBtATgyIgwtkVF8t24B+v9PDHA0CBrTIJi Qv+6KkLS5uFRK+CwN7x8DV13sbRNWjyA9zV2TEpKx//YPbhQpzrKkHYcGnWmEvoA ToWasBYcDtB1AsOy0WC3ATK/nGEv9B2ad+Iip/utjGkE7poan2nmrQ6TlgZU= |
| X-Sasl-Enc | 4AYTSJB2poQTGSvhY68cLdGiCT2Vawf4v5mVfVqkVHLs 1459308866 |
| X-Mailer | MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-c6542207 |
| In-Reply-To | <ndf4k7$jn0$1@dont-email.me> |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.21 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:106025 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016, at 19:54, Rob Gaddi wrote: > Just read on Usenet instead of through the mailing list. That way > you can accept broken threading as a given rather than wonder why it's > happening in a particular case. It's a given everywhere. Any thread that contains a sufficient number of replies from both users using usenet and users using the mailing list (gmane counts as the mailing list, since it _doesn't_ do the broken stuff) is going to be broken for everyone everywhere, though it will be broken in different places. For users reading by the mailing list, Usenet users' replies to Mailing List users will be broken (but their replies to each other will be fine). For users reading by Usenet, Mailing List users' replies to each other will be broken (though all replies made via Usenet or to Usenet users will be fine).
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Threading is foobared? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-03-27 14:01 +1100
Re: Threading is foobared? Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2016-03-27 14:18 +1100
Re: Threading is foobared? Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-03-27 02:25 -0400
Re: Threading is foobared? Tim Golden <mail@timgolden.me.uk> - 2016-03-27 11:29 +0100
Re: Threading is foobared? "Sven R. Kunze" <srkunze@mail.de> - 2016-03-29 12:26 +0200
Re: Threading is foobared? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-03-30 10:43 +1100
Re: Threading is foobared? "Sven R. Kunze" <srkunze@mail.de> - 2016-03-30 10:37 +0200
Re: Threading is foobared? Rob Gaddi <rgaddi@highlandtechnology.invalid> - 2016-03-29 23:54 +0000
Re: Threading is foobared? Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-03-29 23:34 -0400
csiph-web