Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #24764
| From | Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: code review |
| Date | 2012-07-02 01:20 -0400 |
| Organization | > Bestiaria Support Staff < |
| References | (4 earlier) <4fefcf72$0$29988$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <mailman.1670.1341116619.4697.python-list@python.org> <4fefedd8$0$29988$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <mailman.1675.1341124398.4697.python-list@python.org> <4ff0f939$0$29988$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1698.1341206422.4697.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 02 Jul 2012 01:28:25 GMT, Steven D'Aprano
<steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> declaimed the following in
gmane.comp.python.general:
>
> When you make unsafe assumptions about an operator, and get bitten by it,
> the *correct* conclusion should be that the assumption was wrong, not
> that the language is wrong.
>
Well, to be fair, the assumption is not about "an operator" but
about a sequence of operators. I don't think there was any question that
"<" was not a "less than comparison" operator.
OTOH: consider
>>> 5 ^ 2
7
>>> 1 < 3 < 5
True
>>> 3 < 5 < 1
False
>>> True < 1
False
>>>
vs
> 5 ^ 2
[1] 25
> 1 < 3 < 5
Error: unexpected '<' in "1 < 3 <"
> TRUE < 1
[1] FALSE
>
vs
? 5 ^ 2
25
? 1 < 3 < 5
True
? 3 < 5 < 1
True
? True < 1
True
vs
PS E:\UserData\Wulfraed\My Documents> 5 ^ 2
Unexpected token '^' in expression or statement.
At line:1 char:3
Unexpected token '2' in expression or statement.
At line:1 char:5
PS E:\UserData\Wulfraed\My Documents> 1 -lt 3 -lt 5
False
PS E:\UserData\Wulfraed\My Documents> 1 -lt 5 -lt 3
False
PS E:\UserData\Wulfraed\My Documents> 1 -lt 5
True
PS E:\UserData\Wulfraed\My Documents> True -lt 1
The term 'True' is not recognized as the name of a cmdlet, function,
script file, or operable program. Check the spelling of the name, or if
a path was included, verify that the path is correct and try again.
At line:1 char:5
+ True <<<< -lt 1
+ CategoryInfo : ObjectNotFound: (True:String) [],
CommandNotFoundException
+ FullyQualifiedErrorId : CommandNotFoundException
PS E:\UserData\Wulfraed\My Documents> 'True' -lt 1
False
PS E:\UserData\Wulfraed\My Documents> 1 -lt 'True'
Bad argument to operator '-lt': Could not compare "1" to "True". Error:
"Cannot convert value "True" to type "System.Int32". Error: "Input
string was not in a correct format."".
At line:1 char:6
+ 1 -lt <<<< 'True'
+ CategoryInfo : InvalidOperation: (:) [], RuntimeException
+ FullyQualifiedErrorId : BadOperatorArgument
PS E:\UserData\Wulfraed\My Documents> $True -lt 1
False
PS E:\UserData\Wulfraed\My Documents> $True -eq 1
True
Python, R, Visual Basic 6, PowerShell 2, respectively.
Obviously, someone coming over from VB or R who hasn't read the
Python reference is going to wonder why they are getting incorrect
results when doing exponentiation (Isn't there an interface from Python
to R? Now there is confusion in the making!)
{Hmmm... R accepts BOTH 5 ** 2 and 5 ^ 2 for exponentiation}
--
Wulfraed Dennis Lee Bieber AF6VN
wlfraed@ix.netcom.com HTTP://wlfraed.home.netcom.com/
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
code review "Littlefield, Tyler" <tyler@tysdomain.com> - 2012-06-28 20:57 -0600
Re: code review alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2012-06-28 20:58 -0700
Re: code review Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-06-29 07:31 +0000
Re: code review Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-06-29 17:42 +1000
Re: code review "Littlefield, Tyler" <tyler@tysdomain.com> - 2012-06-29 09:03 -0600
Re: code review Alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2012-06-29 19:41 +0000
Re: code review MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2012-06-29 21:09 +0100
Re: code review "Martin P. Hellwig" <martin.hellwig@gmail.com> - 2012-06-29 13:27 -0700
Re: code review Alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2012-06-29 20:43 +0000
Re: code review Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-06-29 19:02 -0400
Re: code review Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-06-29 23:02 -0400
Re: code review "Littlefield, Tyler" <tyler@tysdomain.com> - 2012-06-29 14:49 -0600
Re: code review Alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2012-06-30 09:31 +0000
Re: code review Alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2012-06-30 09:36 +0000
Re: code review Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-06-30 02:28 +0000
Re: code review Alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2012-06-30 09:22 +0000
Re: code review Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-06-29 23:00 -0400
Re: code review Alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2012-06-30 10:04 +0000
Re: code review Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2012-06-30 12:29 +0200
Re: code review Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-06-30 20:39 +0200
Re: code review Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> - 2012-06-30 21:38 +0200
Re: code review Alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2012-06-30 20:30 +0000
Re: code review Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> - 2012-06-30 22:50 +0200
Re: code review Alain Ketterlin <alain@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr> - 2012-06-30 23:07 +0200
Re: code review Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> - 2012-06-30 23:35 +0200
Re: code review Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-06-30 17:47 -0400
Re: code review Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> - 2012-07-01 00:05 +0200
Re: code review Alain Ketterlin <alain@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr> - 2012-07-01 01:03 +0200
Re: code review Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2012-07-01 10:08 +1000
Re: code review Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-07-01 10:37 +1000
Re: code review Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-07-01 03:23 +0000
Re: code review Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-07-01 13:48 +1000
Re: code review Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-07-01 06:54 +0000
Re: code review Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-07-01 16:59 +1000
Re: code review Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-07-01 05:55 -0400
Re: code review Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-07-02 01:26 +0000
Re: code review Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-07-13 12:30 +0000
Re: code review Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-07-13 15:04 +0000
Re: code review Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-07-14 01:36 +1000
Re: code review rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2012-07-13 09:24 -0700
Re: code review Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-07-13 16:39 -0400
Re: code review Duncan Booth <duncan.booth@invalid.invalid> - 2012-07-16 10:43 +0000
Re: code review Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2012-07-16 21:34 +1000
Re: code review Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-07-17 10:54 +0000
Re: code review Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-07-13 19:09 -0400
Re: code review Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-07-14 03:26 -0600
Re: code review Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-07-14 16:42 -0400
Re: code review rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2012-06-30 21:07 -0700
Re: code review Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-07-01 14:20 +1000
Re: code review Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2012-07-01 17:28 +1000
Re: code review Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> - 2012-07-01 09:46 +0200
Re: code review HoneyMonster <nobody@someplace.invalid> - 2012-07-01 20:53 +0000
Re: code review Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2012-07-01 05:18 -0400
Re: code review Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-07-02 00:41 +0000
Re: code review Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2012-07-01 21:40 -0400
Re: code review Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-07-01 13:41 -0400
Re: code review John O'Hagan <research@johnohagan.com> - 2012-07-02 14:43 +1000
Re: Re: code review Evan Driscoll <driscoll@cs.wisc.edu> - 2012-06-30 23:45 -0500
Re: Re: code review Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-07-01 08:57 +0200
Re: code review Alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2012-07-01 09:54 +0000
Re: Re: code review Evan Driscoll <driscoll@cs.wisc.edu> - 2012-07-01 10:48 -0500
Re: Re: code review lars van gemerden <lars@rational-it.com> - 2012-07-06 04:22 -0700
Re: Re: code review lars van gemerden <lars@rational-it.com> - 2012-07-06 04:22 -0700
Re: code review Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-07-06 13:58 +0000
Re: code review Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-07-13 08:32 -0700
Re: code review Evan Driscoll <driscoll@cs.wisc.edu> - 2012-06-30 23:57 -0500
Re: code review Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-07-01 09:04 +0200
Re: code review Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-07-01 02:06 +0000
Re: code review Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-07-01 12:20 +1000
Re: code review Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-07-01 04:17 +0000
Re: code review Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-07-01 14:23 +1000
Re: code review Steven D'Aprano <steve+usenet@pearwood.info> - 2012-07-01 06:27 +0000
Re: code review Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-07-01 16:33 +1000
Re: code review Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-07-02 01:28 +0000
Re: code review Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2012-07-01 21:50 -0400
Re: code review Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-07-02 07:29 +0000
Re: code review Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-07-02 12:04 +1000
Re: code review Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-07-02 08:11 +0000
Re: code review Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-07-02 18:20 +1000
Re: code review Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2012-07-02 08:57 -0700
Re: code review Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-07-03 02:42 +1000
Re: code review Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2012-07-02 11:22 -0700
Re: code review Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> - 2012-07-02 21:06 +0200
Re: code review Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2012-07-02 12:35 -0700
Re: code review Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-07-03 07:57 +1000
Re: code review Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2012-07-03 12:19 +0000
Re: code review Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-07-02 01:20 -0400
Re: code review Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> - 2012-07-02 16:41 +0200
Re: code review Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-07-02 11:33 -0400
Re: code review Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> - 2012-07-01 09:35 +0200
Re: code review Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-07-02 00:43 +0000
Re: code review Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> - 2012-07-02 16:26 +0200
Re: code review Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2012-07-02 08:16 -0700
Re: code review Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-07-03 02:55 +1000
Re: code review Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-07-03 00:57 +0000
Re: code review Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-07-03 11:22 +1000
Re: code review John O'Hagan <research@johnohagan.com> - 2012-07-03 12:25 +1000
Re: code review Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-07-03 04:11 +0000
Re: code review Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-07-03 02:09 -0400
Re: code review Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-07-03 08:33 -0400
Re: code review Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-07-03 16:53 +0100
Re: code review Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-07-03 17:32 -0400
Re: code review rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2012-07-02 22:10 -0700
Re: code review Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2012-07-03 15:46 +1000
Re: code review John O'Hagan <research@johnohagan.com> - 2012-07-04 00:59 +1000
Re: code review Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-07-03 16:50 +0100
Re: code review Paul Rudin <paul.nospam@rudin.co.uk> - 2012-07-04 10:29 +0100
Re: code review Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-07-04 17:25 +0100
Re: code review Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-07-04 01:53 +1000
Re: code review Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-07-03 17:05 +0100
Re: code review Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-07-03 16:13 -0400
Re: code review Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-07-04 07:54 +1000
Re: code review Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-07-04 09:28 +0100
Re: code review rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2012-06-30 19:37 -0700
Re: code review Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-07-01 09:25 +1000
Re: code review Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> - 2012-07-01 01:50 +0200
Re: code review "Martin P. Hellwig" <martin.hellwig@gmail.com> - 2012-06-30 14:48 -0700
Re: code review Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-07-02 13:16 -0600
Re: code review Alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2012-06-30 20:25 +0000
Re: code review Kushal Kumaran <kushal.kumaran+python@gmail.com> - 2012-07-03 23:23 +0530
Re: code review John Gordon <gordon@panix.com> - 2012-07-03 18:18 +0000
Re: code review Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-07-03 12:27 -0600
Re: code review Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-07-04 07:51 +1000
Re: code review Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-07-03 12:19 -0600
Re: code review kushal.kumaran+python@gmail.com - 2012-07-04 08:27 +0530
Re: code review Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-07-04 13:53 +1000
Re: code review Simon Cropper <simoncropper@fossworkflowguides.com> - 2012-07-04 14:55 +1000
Re: code review "Littlefield, Tyler" <tyler@tysdomain.com> - 2012-07-03 23:39 -0600
Re: code review alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2012-07-03 23:17 -0700
Re: code review rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2012-07-04 00:05 -0700
Apology for OT posts (was: code review) John O'Hagan <research@johnohagan.com> - 2012-07-06 12:06 +1000
Re: Apology for OT posts Simon Cropper <simoncropper@fossworkflowguides.com> - 2012-07-06 15:30 +1000
Re: Apology for OT posts Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-07-06 17:45 +1000
Re: Apology for OT posts Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-07-06 10:37 +0100
csiph-web