Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #24702

Re: code review

Date 2012-06-30 22:50 +0200
From Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de>
Subject Re: code review
References (4 earlier) <EaAHr.369967$of1.132220@fx06.am4> <mailman.1651.1341052165.4697.python-list@python.org> <2662370.TGmo96CKe1@PointedEars.de> <mailman.1658.1341085147.4697.python-list@python.org> <VlJHr.500117$jl.112442@fx19.am4>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.1659.1341089444.4697.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On 06/30/2012 10:30 PM, Alister wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Jun 2012 21:38:58 +0200, Thomas Jollans wrote:
> 
>> On 06/30/2012 08:39 PM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>>> Peter Otten wrote:
>>>
>>>> If you spell it
>>>>
>>>> def is_valid_password(password):
>>>>     return mud.minpass <= len(password) <= mud.maxpass
>>>>
>>>> it is even easier to see that you are performing an interval check.
>>>
>>> This is probably a tautology around here, but *what* *a* *great*
>>> *programming* *language*.
>>>
>>>
>> Personally, I don't like this feature of the language. I find a ternary
>> operator that uses symbols that can also be binary operators confusing
>> and inconsistent with the way operators usually work/the way terms are
>> usually associated.
>>
>> It has the charm of being something you'd "naturally" write in the
>> context of non-programming mathematics, at the cost of being very odd
>> indeed in the context of programming in general and Python in
>> particular.
> 
> Surely this fits perfectly with the lines 1 & 7 in the zen of python 
> (import this)
> "Beautifull is better than ugly" and "Readability counts"
> 
> I find that construct both beautiful and readable, if it cannot be used 
> in the languages then that is their loss.

Are we quoting the Zen now?

Contra:

In re usual operator rules:
"Special cases aren't special enough to break the rules."

Which of the two comparisons is done first anyway?
"In the face of ambiguity, refuse the temptation to guess."

Speaking of two comparisons, no "and"!
"Explicit is better than implicit."

Then again, pro:

"Beautiful is better than ugly."
"Readability counts."
"[Although] practicality beats purity."


I can see the appeal. It's quite elegant in and of itself. However, I
find that in the context of the whole Python language, it's a bit of a
glitch and reduces elegance. (I'm probably in the minority on this one)

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

code review "Littlefield, Tyler" <tyler@tysdomain.com> - 2012-06-28 20:57 -0600
  Re: code review alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2012-06-28 20:58 -0700
    Re: code review Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-06-29 07:31 +0000
      Re: code review Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-06-29 17:42 +1000
      Re: code review "Littlefield, Tyler" <tyler@tysdomain.com> - 2012-06-29 09:03 -0600
        Re: code review Alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2012-06-29 19:41 +0000
          Re: code review MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2012-06-29 21:09 +0100
          Re: code review "Martin P. Hellwig" <martin.hellwig@gmail.com> - 2012-06-29 13:27 -0700
            Re: code review Alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2012-06-29 20:43 +0000
              Re: code review Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-06-29 19:02 -0400
              Re: code review Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-06-29 23:02 -0400
          Re: code review "Littlefield, Tyler" <tyler@tysdomain.com> - 2012-06-29 14:49 -0600
            Re: code review Alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2012-06-30 09:31 +0000
              Re: code review Alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2012-06-30 09:36 +0000
          Re: code review Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-06-30 02:28 +0000
            Re: code review Alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2012-06-30 09:22 +0000
          Re: code review Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-06-29 23:00 -0400
        Re: code review Alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2012-06-30 10:04 +0000
          Re: code review Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2012-06-30 12:29 +0200
            Re: code review Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-06-30 20:39 +0200
              Re: code review Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> - 2012-06-30 21:38 +0200
                Re: code review Alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2012-06-30 20:30 +0000
                Re: code review Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> - 2012-06-30 22:50 +0200
                Re: code review Alain Ketterlin <alain@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr> - 2012-06-30 23:07 +0200
                Re: code review Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> - 2012-06-30 23:35 +0200
                Re: code review Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-06-30 17:47 -0400
                Re: code review Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> - 2012-07-01 00:05 +0200
                Re: code review Alain Ketterlin <alain@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr> - 2012-07-01 01:03 +0200
                Re: code review Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2012-07-01 10:08 +1000
                Re: code review Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-07-01 10:37 +1000
                Re: code review Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-07-01 03:23 +0000
                Re: code review Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-07-01 13:48 +1000
                Re: code review Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-07-01 06:54 +0000
                Re: code review Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-07-01 16:59 +1000
                Re: code review Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-07-01 05:55 -0400
                Re: code review Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-07-02 01:26 +0000
                Re: code review Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-07-13 12:30 +0000
                Re: code review Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-07-13 15:04 +0000
                Re: code review Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-07-14 01:36 +1000
                Re: code review rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2012-07-13 09:24 -0700
                Re: code review Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-07-13 16:39 -0400
                Re: code review Duncan Booth <duncan.booth@invalid.invalid> - 2012-07-16 10:43 +0000
                Re: code review Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2012-07-16 21:34 +1000
                Re: code review Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-07-17 10:54 +0000
                Re: code review Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-07-13 19:09 -0400
                Re: code review Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-07-14 03:26 -0600
                Re: code review Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-07-14 16:42 -0400
                Re: code review rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2012-06-30 21:07 -0700
                Re: code review Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-07-01 14:20 +1000
                Re: code review Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2012-07-01 17:28 +1000
                Re: code review Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> - 2012-07-01 09:46 +0200
                Re: code review HoneyMonster <nobody@someplace.invalid> - 2012-07-01 20:53 +0000
                Re: code review Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2012-07-01 05:18 -0400
                Re: code review Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-07-02 00:41 +0000
                Re: code review Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2012-07-01 21:40 -0400
                Re: code review Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-07-01 13:41 -0400
                Re: code review John O'Hagan <research@johnohagan.com> - 2012-07-02 14:43 +1000
                Re: Re: code review Evan Driscoll <driscoll@cs.wisc.edu> - 2012-06-30 23:45 -0500
                Re: Re: code review Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-07-01 08:57 +0200
                Re: code review Alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2012-07-01 09:54 +0000
                Re: Re: code review Evan Driscoll <driscoll@cs.wisc.edu> - 2012-07-01 10:48 -0500
                Re: Re: code review lars van gemerden <lars@rational-it.com> - 2012-07-06 04:22 -0700
                Re: Re: code review lars van gemerden <lars@rational-it.com> - 2012-07-06 04:22 -0700
                Re: code review Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-07-06 13:58 +0000
                Re: code review Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-07-13 08:32 -0700
                Re: code review Evan Driscoll <driscoll@cs.wisc.edu> - 2012-06-30 23:57 -0500
                Re: code review Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-07-01 09:04 +0200
                Re: code review Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-07-01 02:06 +0000
                Re: code review Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-07-01 12:20 +1000
                Re: code review Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-07-01 04:17 +0000
                Re: code review Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-07-01 14:23 +1000
                Re: code review Steven D'Aprano <steve+usenet@pearwood.info> - 2012-07-01 06:27 +0000
                Re: code review Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-07-01 16:33 +1000
                Re: code review Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-07-02 01:28 +0000
                Re: code review Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2012-07-01 21:50 -0400
                Re: code review Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-07-02 07:29 +0000
                Re: code review Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-07-02 12:04 +1000
                Re: code review Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-07-02 08:11 +0000
                Re: code review Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-07-02 18:20 +1000
                Re: code review Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2012-07-02 08:57 -0700
                Re: code review Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-07-03 02:42 +1000
                Re: code review Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2012-07-02 11:22 -0700
                Re: code review Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> - 2012-07-02 21:06 +0200
                Re: code review Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2012-07-02 12:35 -0700
                Re: code review Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-07-03 07:57 +1000
                Re: code review Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2012-07-03 12:19 +0000
                Re: code review Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-07-02 01:20 -0400
                Re: code review Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> - 2012-07-02 16:41 +0200
                Re: code review Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-07-02 11:33 -0400
                Re: code review Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> - 2012-07-01 09:35 +0200
                Re: code review Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-07-02 00:43 +0000
                Re: code review Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> - 2012-07-02 16:26 +0200
                Re: code review Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2012-07-02 08:16 -0700
                Re: code review Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-07-03 02:55 +1000
                Re: code review Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-07-03 00:57 +0000
                Re: code review Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-07-03 11:22 +1000
                Re: code review John O'Hagan <research@johnohagan.com> - 2012-07-03 12:25 +1000
                Re: code review Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-07-03 04:11 +0000
                Re: code review Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-07-03 02:09 -0400
                Re: code review Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-07-03 08:33 -0400
                Re: code review Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-07-03 16:53 +0100
                Re: code review Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-07-03 17:32 -0400
                Re: code review rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2012-07-02 22:10 -0700
                Re: code review Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2012-07-03 15:46 +1000
                Re: code review John O'Hagan <research@johnohagan.com> - 2012-07-04 00:59 +1000
                Re: code review Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-07-03 16:50 +0100
                Re: code review Paul Rudin <paul.nospam@rudin.co.uk> - 2012-07-04 10:29 +0100
                Re: code review Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-07-04 17:25 +0100
                Re: code review Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-07-04 01:53 +1000
                Re: code review Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-07-03 17:05 +0100
                Re: code review Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-07-03 16:13 -0400
                Re: code review Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-07-04 07:54 +1000
                Re: code review Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-07-04 09:28 +0100
                Re: code review rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2012-06-30 19:37 -0700
                Re: code review Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-07-01 09:25 +1000
                Re: code review Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> - 2012-07-01 01:50 +0200
                Re: code review "Martin P. Hellwig" <martin.hellwig@gmail.com> - 2012-06-30 14:48 -0700
                Re: code review Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-07-02 13:16 -0600
            Re: code review Alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2012-06-30 20:25 +0000
          Re: code review Kushal Kumaran <kushal.kumaran+python@gmail.com> - 2012-07-03 23:23 +0530
            Re: code review John Gordon <gordon@panix.com> - 2012-07-03 18:18 +0000
              Re: code review Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-07-03 12:27 -0600
              Re: code review Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-07-04 07:51 +1000
          Re: code review Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-07-03 12:19 -0600
          Re: code review kushal.kumaran+python@gmail.com - 2012-07-04 08:27 +0530
          Re: code review Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-07-04 13:53 +1000
          Re: code review Simon Cropper <simoncropper@fossworkflowguides.com> - 2012-07-04 14:55 +1000
          Re: code review "Littlefield, Tyler" <tyler@tysdomain.com> - 2012-07-03 23:39 -0600
            Re: code review alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2012-07-03 23:17 -0700
              Re: code review rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2012-07-04 00:05 -0700
          Apology for OT posts (was: code review) John O'Hagan <research@johnohagan.com> - 2012-07-06 12:06 +1000
          Re: Apology for OT posts Simon Cropper <simoncropper@fossworkflowguides.com> - 2012-07-06 15:30 +1000
          Re: Apology for OT posts Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-07-06 17:45 +1000
          Re: Apology for OT posts Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-07-06 10:37 +0100

csiph-web