Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #91390

Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table.

X-FeedAbuse http://nntpfeed.proxad.net/abuse.pl feeded by 195.154.70.45
Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!nntpfeed.proxad.net!news.redatomik.org!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <python.list@tim.thechases.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.002
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'operator': 0.03; 'table.': 0.07; '-------': 0.09; 'false)': 0.09; 'xor': 0.09; 'output': 0.15; '(true,': 0.16; '-tkc': 0.16; 'from:addr:python.list': 0.16; 'from:addr:tim.thechases.com': 0.16; 'from:name:tim chase': 0.16; 'received:10.21': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'subject:need': 0.18; 'input': 0.18; '>>>': 0.20; '%s"': 0.22; 'subject:problem': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'flying': 0.29; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.35; 'false': 0.35; 'there': 0.36; 'received:10': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'charset:us-ascii': 0.37; 'skip:p 20': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'enough': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:46': 0.63; 'sounds': 0.72; '(a,': 0.84
X-Sender-Id wwwh|x-authuser|tim@thechases.com
X-Sender-Id wwwh|x-authuser|tim@thechases.com
X-MC-Relay Neutral
X-MailChannels-SenderId wwwh|x-authuser|tim@thechases.com
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id wwwh
X-MC-Loop-Signature 1432850522709:83612882
X-MC-Ingress-Time 1432850522709
Date Thu, 28 May 2015 17:02:29 -0500
From Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com>
To python-list@python.org
Subject Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table.
In-Reply-To <3794b$55678d83$5419aafe$56138@news.ziggo.nl>
References <3794b$55678d83$5419aafe$56138@news.ziggo.nl>
X-Mailer Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-AuthUser tim@thechases.com
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.20+
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.141.1432850534.5151.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 30
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1432850534 news.xs4all.nl 2964 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:58141
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:91390

Show key headers only | View raw

On 2015-05-28 23:50, Skybuck Flying wrote:
> A = input
> B = input
> C = output
> 
> A B C:
> -------
> F F T
> F T F
> T F T
> T T T
> 
> Surpisingly enough I don't think there is a casual/common operator
> for this thruth table.
> 
> AND does not apply.
> OR does not apply.
> XOR does not apply.

Sounds like you want "a or not b"

>>> print("\n".join("A=%s B=%s: %s" % (a, b, a or not b) for a in (True, False) for b in (True, False)))
A=True B=True: True
A=True B=False: True
A=False B=True: False
A=False B=False: True

-tkc

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-05-28 23:50 +0200
  Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. (thruth table to logic/boolean operations generator sought/needed) "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-05-28 23:55 +0200
    Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. (thruth table to logic/boolean operations generator sought/needed) "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-05-29 00:07 +0200
      Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. (thruth table to logic/boolean operations generator sought/needed) "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-05-29 00:08 +0200
        Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. (thruth table to logic/boolean operations generator sought/needed) "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-05-29 00:12 +0200
          Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. (thruth table to logic/boolean operations generator sought/needed) "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-05-29 04:45 +0200
            Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. (thruth table to logic/boolean operations generator sought/needed) "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-05-29 04:56 +0200
        Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. (thruth table to logic/boolean operations generator sought/needed) Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-05-28 22:13 +0000
          Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. (thruth table to logic/boolean operations generator sought/needed) Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-05-28 22:15 +0000
  Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. sohcahtoa82@gmail.com - 2015-05-28 14:58 -0700
    Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2015-05-28 16:16 -0600
      Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-05-28 22:54 +0000
        Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-05-28 23:03 +0000
          Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2015-05-28 18:52 -0600
      Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. sohcahtoa82@gmail.com - 2015-05-28 17:15 -0700
    Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2015-05-28 23:25 +0000
      Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-05-29 04:46 +0200
  Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-05-28 22:01 +0000
    Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-05-28 22:11 +0000
  Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2015-05-28 17:02 -0500
  Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@ling.helsinki.fi> - 2015-05-29 01:13 +0300
  Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2015-05-28 18:39 -0400
    Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-05-28 23:56 +0100
  Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Paul <nospam@needed.com> - 2015-05-28 19:21 -0400
  Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. M Philbrook <jamie_ka1lpa@charter.net> - 2015-05-29 19:07 -0400

csiph-web