Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #110142

Re: Method Chaining

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: Method Chaining
Date Sun, 19 Jun 2016 08:01:53 -0700
Lines 22
Message-ID <mailman.136.1466348518.2288.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
References <74831a84-7b05-4242-b4c0-4a90d147717b@googlegroups.com> <CAGgTfkPETwxb8kx1PcR+F5qVEm-pkxHFDE4=aw+WNE2itsM3+w@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.99.1466137450.2288.python-list@python.org> <33f73a24-4dcf-429b-9264-a3f3098f1cc3@googlegroups.com> <ed84c81e-a905-48d9-96ca-58aa5f419e68@googlegroups.com> <5763c2a7$0$1602$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <2dffea93-3dbd-4d04-93ed-6e02e3dd8660@googlegroups.com> <m1inx6wvni.fsf@iKarel.lan> <CAB1GNpRLRNDQ3f4a7MBeBXZqO+9ypR-uEEGW85arOwEimsQsdQ@mail.gmail.com> <5765B36F.5010506@stoneleaf.us> <CAB1GNpSStN+eQfwyMk02QbaRQscn5DSK-FwNozXE+2Gf0EYPAA@mail.gmail.com> <5766B3E1.2020807@stoneleaf.us>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace news.uni-berlin.de 77XA9rFBbleDmQ+O0UJc4AM5TaW7/bg5ypNfaklF94LA==
Return-Path <ethan@stoneleaf.us>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.002
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'modifying': 0.07; 'ambiguity': 0.09; 'from:addr:ethan': 0.09; 'from:addr:stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'from:name:ethan furman': 0.09; 'message-id:@stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'raised.': 0.09; 'question.': 0.13; '2016': 0.16; 'innermost': 0.16; 'joonas': 0.16; 'liik': 0.16; 'nightmare': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'attribute': 0.18; 'say,': 0.18; '>>>': 0.20; 'otherwise,': 0.20; 'am,': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; "doesn't": 0.26; 'now?': 0.29; '~ethan~': 0.29; 'could': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'say': 0.37; 'anything': 0.38; 'why': 0.39; 'does': 0.39; 'from:': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'leading': 0.61; 'does?': 0.84; 'to:name:python': 0.84; 'ethan': 0.91; 'furman': 0.91
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
In-Reply-To <CAB1GNpSStN+eQfwyMk02QbaRQscn5DSK-FwNozXE+2Gf0EYPAA@mail.gmail.com>
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.22
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID <5766B3E1.2020807@stoneleaf.us>
X-Mailman-Original-References <74831a84-7b05-4242-b4c0-4a90d147717b@googlegroups.com> <CAGgTfkPETwxb8kx1PcR+F5qVEm-pkxHFDE4=aw+WNE2itsM3+w@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.99.1466137450.2288.python-list@python.org> <33f73a24-4dcf-429b-9264-a3f3098f1cc3@googlegroups.com> <ed84c81e-a905-48d9-96ca-58aa5f419e68@googlegroups.com> <5763c2a7$0$1602$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <2dffea93-3dbd-4d04-93ed-6e02e3dd8660@googlegroups.com> <m1inx6wvni.fsf@iKarel.lan> <CAB1GNpRLRNDQ3f4a7MBeBXZqO+9ypR-uEEGW85arOwEimsQsdQ@mail.gmail.com> <5765B36F.5010506@stoneleaf.us> <CAB1GNpSStN+eQfwyMk02QbaRQscn5DSK-FwNozXE+2Gf0EYPAA@mail.gmail.com>
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:110142

Show key headers only | View raw

On 06/19/2016 04:56 AM, Joonas Liik wrote:
> On 18 June 2016 at 23:47, Ethan Furman wrote:
>> On 06/18/2016 07:05 AM, Joonas Liik wrote:

>>> the leading dot does not resolve the ambiguity that arises from:
>>>
>>> with ob_a:
>>>       with ob_b:
>>>           .attr_c = 42 # which object are we modifying right now?
>>
>>
>> The innermost one.  Why would it be anything else?
>
> What if ob_b does not have attribute attr_c but ob_a does?

Good question.  I would say that _only_ the innermost with object is 
searched, and if it doesn't have the requested attribute an 
AttributeError is raised.  Otherwise, as you say, it could be a 
nightmare to maintain.

--
~Ethan~

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Method Chaining Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-06-16 19:02 -0700
  Re: Method Chaining Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-06-17 12:39 +1000
  Re: Method Chaining Michael Selik <michael.selik@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 04:23 +0000
    Re: Method Chaining Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-06-16 21:37 -0700
      Re: Method Chaining Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2016-06-17 01:13 -0700
        Re: Method Chaining Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 01:38 -0700
          Re: Method Chaining Jussi Piitulainen <jussi.piitulainen@helsinki.fi> - 2016-06-17 11:45 +0300
        Re: Method Chaining Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-06-17 19:28 +1000
          Re: Method Chaining Michael Selik <michael.selik@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 13:34 +0000
            Re: Method Chaining Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 15:26 -0700
              Re: Method Chaining Michael Selik <michael.selik@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 22:45 +0000
              Re: Method Chaining Michael Selik <michael.selik@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 23:10 +0000
          Re: Method Chaining Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 09:48 -0700
            Re: Method Chaining Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 15:25 -0700
            Re: Method Chaining Pete Forman <petef4+usenet@gmail.com> - 2016-06-18 13:04 +0100
              Re: Method Chaining Joonas Liik <liik.joonas@gmail.com> - 2016-06-18 17:05 +0300
                Re: Method Chaining Pete Forman <petef4+usenet@gmail.com> - 2016-06-18 16:42 +0100
              Re: Method Chaining Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-06-18 08:35 -0700
                Re: Method Chaining Pete Forman <petef4+usenet@gmail.com> - 2016-06-19 11:16 +0100
              Re: Method Chaining Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2016-06-18 13:47 -0700
              Re: Method Chaining Joonas Liik <liik.joonas@gmail.com> - 2016-06-19 14:56 +0300
              Re: Method Chaining Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2016-06-19 08:01 -0700
              Re: Method Chaining Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2016-06-19 09:14 -0600
              Re: Method Chaining Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2016-06-19 08:56 -0700
                Re: Method Chaining Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-06-19 09:03 -0700
        Re: Method Chaining Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 15:22 -0700
          Re: Method Chaining Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2016-06-17 17:02 -0700

csiph-web