Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #110142

Re: Method Chaining

From Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: Method Chaining
Date 2016-06-19 08:01 -0700
Message-ID <mailman.136.1466348518.2288.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
References (7 earlier) <m1inx6wvni.fsf@iKarel.lan> <CAB1GNpRLRNDQ3f4a7MBeBXZqO+9ypR-uEEGW85arOwEimsQsdQ@mail.gmail.com> <5765B36F.5010506@stoneleaf.us> <CAB1GNpSStN+eQfwyMk02QbaRQscn5DSK-FwNozXE+2Gf0EYPAA@mail.gmail.com> <5766B3E1.2020807@stoneleaf.us>

Show all headers | View raw

On 06/19/2016 04:56 AM, Joonas Liik wrote:
> On 18 June 2016 at 23:47, Ethan Furman wrote:
>> On 06/18/2016 07:05 AM, Joonas Liik wrote:

>>> the leading dot does not resolve the ambiguity that arises from:
>>>
>>> with ob_a:
>>>       with ob_b:
>>>           .attr_c = 42 # which object are we modifying right now?
>>
>>
>> The innermost one.  Why would it be anything else?
>
> What if ob_b does not have attribute attr_c but ob_a does?

Good question.  I would say that _only_ the innermost with object is 
searched, and if it doesn't have the requested attribute an 
AttributeError is raised.  Otherwise, as you say, it could be a 
nightmare to maintain.

--
~Ethan~

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Method Chaining Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-06-16 19:02 -0700
  Re: Method Chaining Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-06-17 12:39 +1000
  Re: Method Chaining Michael Selik <michael.selik@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 04:23 +0000
    Re: Method Chaining Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-06-16 21:37 -0700
      Re: Method Chaining Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2016-06-17 01:13 -0700
        Re: Method Chaining Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 01:38 -0700
          Re: Method Chaining Jussi Piitulainen <jussi.piitulainen@helsinki.fi> - 2016-06-17 11:45 +0300
        Re: Method Chaining Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-06-17 19:28 +1000
          Re: Method Chaining Michael Selik <michael.selik@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 13:34 +0000
            Re: Method Chaining Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 15:26 -0700
              Re: Method Chaining Michael Selik <michael.selik@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 22:45 +0000
              Re: Method Chaining Michael Selik <michael.selik@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 23:10 +0000
          Re: Method Chaining Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 09:48 -0700
            Re: Method Chaining Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 15:25 -0700
            Re: Method Chaining Pete Forman <petef4+usenet@gmail.com> - 2016-06-18 13:04 +0100
              Re: Method Chaining Joonas Liik <liik.joonas@gmail.com> - 2016-06-18 17:05 +0300
                Re: Method Chaining Pete Forman <petef4+usenet@gmail.com> - 2016-06-18 16:42 +0100
              Re: Method Chaining Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-06-18 08:35 -0700
                Re: Method Chaining Pete Forman <petef4+usenet@gmail.com> - 2016-06-19 11:16 +0100
              Re: Method Chaining Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2016-06-18 13:47 -0700
              Re: Method Chaining Joonas Liik <liik.joonas@gmail.com> - 2016-06-19 14:56 +0300
              Re: Method Chaining Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2016-06-19 08:01 -0700
              Re: Method Chaining Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2016-06-19 09:14 -0600
              Re: Method Chaining Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2016-06-19 08:56 -0700
                Re: Method Chaining Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-06-19 09:03 -0700
        Re: Method Chaining Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 15:22 -0700
          Re: Method Chaining Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2016-06-17 17:02 -0700

csiph-web