Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #110046
| From | Michael Selik <michael.selik@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: Method Chaining |
| Date | 2016-06-17 04:23 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.99.1466137450.2288.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| References | <74831a84-7b05-4242-b4c0-4a90d147717b@googlegroups.com> <CAGgTfkPETwxb8kx1PcR+F5qVEm-pkxHFDE4=aw+WNE2itsM3+w@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 10:53 PM Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Example from <http://default-cube.deviantart.com/art/Truchet-612095093>,
> concisely expressing a complex drawing sequence:
>
> (g
> .move_to((p1 + p2a) / 2)
> .line_to(p1 + (p2 - p1) * frac)
> .line_to((p1 + p1a) / 2)
> .stroke()
> .move_to((p2 + p2a) / 2)
> .line_to(p2 + (p1 - p2) * frac)
> .line_to((p2 + p1a) / 2)
> .stroke()
> )
>
Wouldn't that look nicer with the ``g`` repeated on every line, no extra
indentation, and no extraneous parentheses?
g.move_to((p1 + p2a) / 2)
g.line_to(p1 + (p2 - p1) * frac)
g.line_to((p1 + p1a) / 2)
g.stroke()
g.move_to((p2 + p2a) / 2)
g.line_to(p2 + (p1 - p2) * frac)
g.line_to((p2 + p1a) / 2)
g.stroke()
Sometimes it's hard to know when a function has a side-effect. I appreciate
that these impure functions tend to return None.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Method Chaining Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-06-16 19:02 -0700
Re: Method Chaining Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-06-17 12:39 +1000
Re: Method Chaining Michael Selik <michael.selik@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 04:23 +0000
Re: Method Chaining Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-06-16 21:37 -0700
Re: Method Chaining Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2016-06-17 01:13 -0700
Re: Method Chaining Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 01:38 -0700
Re: Method Chaining Jussi Piitulainen <jussi.piitulainen@helsinki.fi> - 2016-06-17 11:45 +0300
Re: Method Chaining Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-06-17 19:28 +1000
Re: Method Chaining Michael Selik <michael.selik@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 13:34 +0000
Re: Method Chaining Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 15:26 -0700
Re: Method Chaining Michael Selik <michael.selik@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 22:45 +0000
Re: Method Chaining Michael Selik <michael.selik@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 23:10 +0000
Re: Method Chaining Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 09:48 -0700
Re: Method Chaining Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 15:25 -0700
Re: Method Chaining Pete Forman <petef4+usenet@gmail.com> - 2016-06-18 13:04 +0100
Re: Method Chaining Joonas Liik <liik.joonas@gmail.com> - 2016-06-18 17:05 +0300
Re: Method Chaining Pete Forman <petef4+usenet@gmail.com> - 2016-06-18 16:42 +0100
Re: Method Chaining Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-06-18 08:35 -0700
Re: Method Chaining Pete Forman <petef4+usenet@gmail.com> - 2016-06-19 11:16 +0100
Re: Method Chaining Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2016-06-18 13:47 -0700
Re: Method Chaining Joonas Liik <liik.joonas@gmail.com> - 2016-06-19 14:56 +0300
Re: Method Chaining Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2016-06-19 08:01 -0700
Re: Method Chaining Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2016-06-19 09:14 -0600
Re: Method Chaining Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2016-06-19 08:56 -0700
Re: Method Chaining Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-06-19 09:03 -0700
Re: Method Chaining Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 15:22 -0700
Re: Method Chaining Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2016-06-17 17:02 -0700
csiph-web