Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #110138

Re: Method Chaining

Path csiph.com!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From Joonas Liik <liik.joonas@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: Method Chaining
Date Sun, 19 Jun 2016 14:56:44 +0300
Lines 37
Message-ID <mailman.133.1466337413.2288.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
References <74831a84-7b05-4242-b4c0-4a90d147717b@googlegroups.com> <CAGgTfkPETwxb8kx1PcR+F5qVEm-pkxHFDE4=aw+WNE2itsM3+w@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.99.1466137450.2288.python-list@python.org> <33f73a24-4dcf-429b-9264-a3f3098f1cc3@googlegroups.com> <ed84c81e-a905-48d9-96ca-58aa5f419e68@googlegroups.com> <5763c2a7$0$1602$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <2dffea93-3dbd-4d04-93ed-6e02e3dd8660@googlegroups.com> <m1inx6wvni.fsf@iKarel.lan> <CAB1GNpRLRNDQ3f4a7MBeBXZqO+9ypR-uEEGW85arOwEimsQsdQ@mail.gmail.com> <5765B36F.5010506@stoneleaf.us> <CAB1GNpSStN+eQfwyMk02QbaRQscn5DSK-FwNozXE+2Gf0EYPAA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Trace news.uni-berlin.de DRYS43n1/qyMFni4eqR9ZQgIOPhGg6NXdvcn8EKOMlow==
Return-Path <liik.joonas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.030
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.94; '*S*': 0.00; 'modifying': 0.07; 'cc:addr :python-list': 0.09; 'ambiguity': 0.09; '2016': 0.16; 'cc:name:python': 0.16; 'innermost': 0.16; 'joonas': 0.16; 'liik': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'attribute': 0.18; '>>>': 0.20; 'cc:2**0': 0.20; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.20; 'am,': 0.23; 'bit': 0.23; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'bugs': 0.27; 'equivalent': 0.27; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'now?': 0.29; 'obscure': 0.29; '~ethan~': 0.29; 'url:mailman': 0.30; 'code': 0.30; 'writes': 0.30; 'url:python': 0.33; 'url:listinfo': 0.34; 'structure': 0.34; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; 'received:209.85': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.38; 'anything': 0.38; 'why': 0.39; 'does': 0.39; 'received:209.85.214': 0.39; 'from:': 0.39; 'url:mail': 0.40; 'leading': 0.61; 'real': 0.62; 'back': 0.62; 'is.': 0.63; 'fall': 0.66; 'does?': 0.84; 'pain': 0.84; 'ethan': 0.91; 'furman': 0.91
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=xeucUEpUlzOEJH+2vD7SVeKXDB0Ltw0gu/YrO8QVFBY=; b=Z/BSuDaZN2aMeyq+KI0X4Jriw/EYYo4/wBdXR+wkjbSKVlg3iAKRt9qV4LQjYdeW6p pSG6oV/Ft2tveyvoamudvuYGIJJRGFcruvyR3y/PPpA7vZib4ArWFvSsV3FyFM7bEuYs inamJMt0KJqQmAlmXtqT6mIrQ4nUmYHlNAB4IA6f+e0WPwx6McvCKM+0aNT/sv9crB5B DyNiwt8cUQWffqAV1szP4NQCTwPu2OFUIupzFUF7dG8nP0615+Jbo8LWYrz/RRMf/bX/ ZUTbh2yLqbwzFk2YglguAZcPmRfkpVQHjzSvBaFUSECMBFsDrHXlNw8nLKq4/UwjbyPh 4rug==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xeucUEpUlzOEJH+2vD7SVeKXDB0Ltw0gu/YrO8QVFBY=; b=LtJaBfjuerhNRxJNRJe516auI3jjcWT1oS5EmPAUKmVLdHzOdZogR2UxjkxUaFoWgN k/fAKUbNR81MH0SxJ40mVyrl2E5JgfZASgzGaV4AkSeU/LTfB9/jrChMuQcAC5ZEAVyV Brvt6YyQ5T4cqH84xyJn6/4hCQb2xeQJplo5wNJ34NnJHatM1NIvkaLfDk/nD2L1iadU 4ChhZv2PSwhkVh0U692svSHc2wtAy9u95V6Yzjc/Sj231Ghw928+MuydiBdAf2/yPar/ mUgnBB8QTlIytmM+tN+AKbEODGdPaargY1dxh7/QjrN6iD84vEniLIazj4chcipIg7Ty HAaw==
X-Gm-Message-State ALyK8tIHovDuQeAjELw96+QJLs78ccbeG0EU34qvoRH/oM/Hz3OXhi3tai1O8qBYELahd+O29WOQ+OOp/2zRBA==
X-Received by 10.36.134.3 with SMTP id u3mr9613332itd.23.1466337405166; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 04:56:45 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To <5765B36F.5010506@stoneleaf.us>
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.22
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID <CAB1GNpSStN+eQfwyMk02QbaRQscn5DSK-FwNozXE+2Gf0EYPAA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailman-Original-References <74831a84-7b05-4242-b4c0-4a90d147717b@googlegroups.com> <CAGgTfkPETwxb8kx1PcR+F5qVEm-pkxHFDE4=aw+WNE2itsM3+w@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.99.1466137450.2288.python-list@python.org> <33f73a24-4dcf-429b-9264-a3f3098f1cc3@googlegroups.com> <ed84c81e-a905-48d9-96ca-58aa5f419e68@googlegroups.com> <5763c2a7$0$1602$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <2dffea93-3dbd-4d04-93ed-6e02e3dd8660@googlegroups.com> <m1inx6wvni.fsf@iKarel.lan> <CAB1GNpRLRNDQ3f4a7MBeBXZqO+9ypR-uEEGW85arOwEimsQsdQ@mail.gmail.com> <5765B36F.5010506@stoneleaf.us>
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:110138

Show key headers only | View raw

On 18 June 2016 at 23:47, Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> wrote:
> On 06/18/2016 07:05 AM, Joonas Liik wrote:
>>
>> On 18 June 2016 at 15:04, Pete Forman wrote:
>
>
>>> with obj:
>>>      .a = 1                # equivalent to obj.a = 1
>>>      .total = .total + 1   # obj.total = obj.total + 1
>>
>>
>> the leading dot does not resolve the ambiguity that arises from:
>>
>> with ob_a:
>>      with ob_b:
>>          .attr_c = 42 # which object are we modifying right now?
>
>
> The innermost one.  Why would it be anything else?
>
> --
> ~Ethan~
>
> --
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

What if ob_b does not have attribute attr_c but ob_a does?

This may be simple for a computer to solve - try looking it up on ob_b
and fall back to ob_a if ob_b has no such attr..  but it is hard(er)
to reason about for a human. You need to know about the inner
structure of ob_b. not an issue for the person who writes it at first
(unless 2 months have passed ) but a real pain if you are seeing that
bit of code for the first time or are not intimately familiar with
what ob_b is.

Not unsolvable ofc, but makes it easier for obscure bugs to hide.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Method Chaining Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-06-16 19:02 -0700
  Re: Method Chaining Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-06-17 12:39 +1000
  Re: Method Chaining Michael Selik <michael.selik@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 04:23 +0000
    Re: Method Chaining Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-06-16 21:37 -0700
      Re: Method Chaining Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2016-06-17 01:13 -0700
        Re: Method Chaining Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 01:38 -0700
          Re: Method Chaining Jussi Piitulainen <jussi.piitulainen@helsinki.fi> - 2016-06-17 11:45 +0300
        Re: Method Chaining Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-06-17 19:28 +1000
          Re: Method Chaining Michael Selik <michael.selik@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 13:34 +0000
            Re: Method Chaining Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 15:26 -0700
              Re: Method Chaining Michael Selik <michael.selik@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 22:45 +0000
              Re: Method Chaining Michael Selik <michael.selik@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 23:10 +0000
          Re: Method Chaining Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 09:48 -0700
            Re: Method Chaining Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 15:25 -0700
            Re: Method Chaining Pete Forman <petef4+usenet@gmail.com> - 2016-06-18 13:04 +0100
              Re: Method Chaining Joonas Liik <liik.joonas@gmail.com> - 2016-06-18 17:05 +0300
                Re: Method Chaining Pete Forman <petef4+usenet@gmail.com> - 2016-06-18 16:42 +0100
              Re: Method Chaining Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-06-18 08:35 -0700
                Re: Method Chaining Pete Forman <petef4+usenet@gmail.com> - 2016-06-19 11:16 +0100
              Re: Method Chaining Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2016-06-18 13:47 -0700
              Re: Method Chaining Joonas Liik <liik.joonas@gmail.com> - 2016-06-19 14:56 +0300
              Re: Method Chaining Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2016-06-19 08:01 -0700
              Re: Method Chaining Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2016-06-19 09:14 -0600
              Re: Method Chaining Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2016-06-19 08:56 -0700
                Re: Method Chaining Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2016-06-19 09:03 -0700
        Re: Method Chaining Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 15:22 -0700
          Re: Method Chaining Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2016-06-17 17:02 -0700

csiph-web