Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #89966

Re: Step further with filebasedMessages

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On May 5, 2015 5:46 AM, "Cecil Westerhof" <Cecil@decebal.nl> wrote:
>
> Op Tuesday 5 May 2015 12:41 CEST schreef Steven D'Aprano:
>
> > # Untested.
> > def get_message_slice(message_filename, start=0, end=None, step=1):
> > real_file = expanduser(message_filename)
> > messages = []
> > # FIXME: I assume this is expensive. Can we avoid it?
> > nr_of_messages = get_nr_of_messages(real_file)
>
> If I want to give the possibility to use negative values also, I need
> the value.

You could make this call only if one of the boundaries is actually
negative. Then callers that provide positive values don't need to pay the
cost of that case.

Alternatively, consider that it's common for slices of iterators to
disallow negative indices altogether, and question whether you really need
that.

> > the_slice = slice(start, end, step)
> > # Calculate the indexes in the given slice, e.g.
> > # start=1, stop=7, step=2 gives [1,3,5].
> > indices = range(*(the_slice.indices(nr_of_messages)))
> > with open(real_file, 'r') as f:
> > for i, message in enumerate(f):
> > if i in indices:
> > messages.append(message)
> > return messages

I approve of using slice.indices instead of calculating the indices
manually, but otherwise, the islice approach feels cleaner to me. This
reads like a reimplementation of that.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Step further with filebasedMessages Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-05-05 10:52 +0200
  Re: Step further with filebasedMessages Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-05-05 19:20 +1000
    Re: Step further with filebasedMessages Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-05-05 12:14 +0200
  Re: Step further with filebasedMessages Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-05-05 20:41 +1000
    Re: Step further with filebasedMessages Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-05-05 13:27 +0200
      Re: Step further with filebasedMessages Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-05-05 07:57 -0600
        Re: Step further with filebasedMessages Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-05-05 16:51 +0200
  Re: Step further with filebasedMessages Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2015-05-05 13:08 +0200
    Re: Step further with filebasedMessages Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-05-05 17:25 +0200
      Re: Step further with filebasedMessages Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2015-05-05 13:10 -0400

csiph-web