Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #89967

Re: Step further with filebasedMessages

From Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: Step further with filebasedMessages
Organization Decebal Computing
References <87oalzh0d5.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> <55489e80$0$12913$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <87fv7bgt6t.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> <mailman.125.1430834230.12865.python-list@python.org>
Date 2015-05-05 16:51 +0200
Message-ID <87bnhzgjqr.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


Op Tuesday 5 May 2015 15:57 CEST schreef Ian Kelly:

> On May 5, 2015 5:46 AM, "Cecil Westerhof" <Cecil@decebal.nl> wrote:
>>
>> Op Tuesday 5 May 2015 12:41 CEST schreef Steven D'Aprano:
>>
>>> # Untested. def get_message_slice(message_filename, start=0,
>>> end=None, step=1): real_file = expanduser(message_filename)
>>> messages = [] # FIXME: I assume this is expensive. Can we avoid
>>> it? nr_of_messages = get_nr_of_messages(real_file)
>>
>> If I want to give the possibility to use negative values also, I
>> need the value.
>
> You could make this call only if one of the boundaries is actually
> negative. Then callers that provide positive values don't need to
> pay the cost of that case.

You have a point there. I will think about it.


> Alternatively, consider that it's common for slices of iterators to
> disallow negative indices altogether, and question whether you
> really need that.

It was an idea I got from this newsgroup. :-D And I liked it,
otherwise I would not have implemented it.

-- 
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Step further with filebasedMessages Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-05-05 10:52 +0200
  Re: Step further with filebasedMessages Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-05-05 19:20 +1000
    Re: Step further with filebasedMessages Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-05-05 12:14 +0200
  Re: Step further with filebasedMessages Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-05-05 20:41 +1000
    Re: Step further with filebasedMessages Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-05-05 13:27 +0200
      Re: Step further with filebasedMessages Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-05-05 07:57 -0600
        Re: Step further with filebasedMessages Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-05-05 16:51 +0200
  Re: Step further with filebasedMessages Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2015-05-05 13:08 +0200
    Re: Step further with filebasedMessages Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-05-05 17:25 +0200
      Re: Step further with filebasedMessages Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2015-05-05 13:10 -0400

csiph-web