Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #76785
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: Python vs C++ |
| Date | Fri, 22 Aug 2014 12:29:51 +0300 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 47 |
| Message-ID | <87fvgoj2i8.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> (permalink) |
| References | <mailman.13248.1408625664.18130.python-list@python.org> <lt6tk2$118$1@dont-email.me> <mailman.13280.1408697414.18130.python-list@python.org> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Injection-Info | mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="ff5cf27ef3d5b31f034d3b72bdc27a41"; logging-data="31480"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18uMaOjK770uvJrN329mwO9" |
| User-Agent | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:fgnse7X602H37HvKyX99+VZQmNw= sha1:BnXJYs92wB1SWwBdnyjpVqCZ+6k= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:76785 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> wrote:
>> I'm not even convinced that the development time is significantly
>> lower in Python within this overlap.
>
> It usually will be, though not always.
Even more to the point, it is far easier to program correctly in Python
than C++. The higher-level concepts let you concentrate on the
high-level problem at hand instead of the low-level chores where you are
bound to make careless mistakes or take dangerous shortcuts.
So my advise is, use as high-level programming language as you can. If
you can't, deal with it, but often you can break your system into parts
where only a small corner needs to be implemented at the low level.
Remember, too, that there is a whole sliding scale of programming
languages:
assembly
C
C++
Go
Java/C#
Python
Scheme
Bash
In my current work, the choice is between C, Python and Bash. Some
non-STL C++ in the mix.
In my previous job, it was Java, Python and Bash, with some JNI in the
mix.
I think Python's abstraction level is excellent for most needs. C++ is
squeezed from all sides. Its downfall is that it is trying to cover
everything instead of just ceding the high-level turf to other
languages. Thus, it is too elaborate for the nimble stuff, and you will
often simply use C where you need nimble.
C is readily supported by all extension APIs. Its calling conventions
are stable and well-understood. Its runtime requirements are trivial.
Plus, you don't have to be a Medieval Scholar to program in it.
Marko
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Python vs C++ David Palao <dpalao.python@gmail.com> - 2014-08-21 14:54 +0200
Re: Python vs C++ wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2014-08-21 07:08 -0700
Re: Python vs C++ Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-08-21 07:10 -0700
Re: Python vs C++ Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2014-08-21 14:59 +0000
Re: Python vs C++ Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2014-08-21 23:12 -0400
Re: Python vs C++ Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2014-08-22 10:05 +0200
Re: Python vs C++ Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-08-22 18:50 +1000
Re: Python vs C++ Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-08-22 12:29 +0300
Re: Python vs C++ "Neil D. Cerutti" <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2014-08-22 08:51 -0400
Re: Python vs C++ Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com> - 2014-08-22 07:58 -0500
Re: Python vs C++ Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-08-22 20:16 +0300
Re: Python vs C++ mm0fmf <none@mailinator.com> - 2014-08-23 17:47 +0100
Re: Python vs C++ Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-08-23 19:54 +0300
Re: Python vs C++ Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-08-22 23:00 +1000
Re: Python vs C++ Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2014-08-22 21:25 +0200
Re: Python vs C++ Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml@behnel.de> - 2014-08-22 21:58 +0200
Re: Python vs C++ Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-08-22 23:06 +0300
Re: Python vs C++ Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2014-08-22 15:38 -0600
Re: Python vs C++ wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2014-08-23 03:00 -0700
Re: Python vs C++ Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-08-23 07:49 +1000
Re: Python vs C++ Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-08-23 05:38 -0700
Re: Python vs C++ Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-08-23 23:00 +1000
Re: Python vs C++ Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-08-23 08:02 -0600
Re: Python vs C++ Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-08-23 07:21 -0700
Re: Python vs C++ Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-08-23 16:51 -0400
Re: Python vs C++ Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-08-24 00:21 +1000
Re: Python vs C++ Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-08-23 15:09 -0400
Re: Python vs C++ Joseph Martinot-Lagarde <joseph.martinot-lagarde@m4x.org> - 2014-08-24 14:54 +0200
Re: Python vs C++ "Neil D. Cerutti" <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2014-08-25 09:01 -0400
Re: Python vs C++ Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2014-08-22 15:56 -0600
Re: Python vs C++ Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-08-23 08:00 +1000
Re: Python vs C++ Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-08-23 10:27 +0300
Re: Python vs C++ dieter <dieter@handshake.de> - 2014-08-23 07:56 +0200
Re: Python vs C++ Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-08-23 16:11 +1000
Re: Python vs C++ Paul Rudin <paul.nospam@rudin.co.uk> - 2014-08-23 08:36 +0100
Re: Python vs C++ Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-08-23 18:04 +1000
Re: Python vs C++ dieter <dieter@handshake.de> - 2014-08-23 07:48 +0200
csiph-web