Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Subject: Re: Python vs C++
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 12:29:51 +0300
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 47
Message-ID: <87fvgoj2i8.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net>
References: <mailman.13248.1408625664.18130.python-list@python.org> <lt6tk2$118$1@dont-email.me> <mailman.13280.1408697414.18130.python-list@python.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="ff5cf27ef3d5b31f034d3b72bdc27a41"; logging-data="31480"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18uMaOjK770uvJrN329mwO9"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:fgnse7X602H37HvKyX99+VZQmNw= sha1:BnXJYs92wB1SWwBdnyjpVqCZ+6k=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:76785

Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>:

> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> wrote:
>> I'm not even convinced that the development time is significantly
>> lower in Python within this overlap.
>
> It usually will be, though not always.

Even more to the point, it is far easier to program correctly in Python
than C++. The higher-level concepts let you concentrate on the
high-level problem at hand instead of the low-level chores where you are
bound to make careless mistakes or take dangerous shortcuts.

So my advise is, use as high-level programming language as you can. If
you can't, deal with it, but often you can break your system into parts
where only a small corner needs to be implemented at the low level.

Remember, too, that there is a whole sliding scale of programming
languages:

   assembly
       C
          C++
              Go
                 Java/C#
                     Python
                         Scheme
                             Bash

In my current work, the choice is between C, Python and Bash. Some
non-STL C++ in the mix.

In my previous job, it was Java, Python and Bash, with some JNI in the
mix.

I think Python's abstraction level is excellent for most needs. C++ is
squeezed from all sides. Its downfall is that it is trying to cover
everything instead of just ceding the high-level turf to other
languages. Thus, it is too elaborate for the nimble stuff, and you will
often simply use C where you need nimble.

C is readily supported by all extension APIs. Its calling conventions
are stable and well-understood. Its runtime requirements are trivial.
Plus, you don't have to be a Medieval Scholar to program in it.


Marko