Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #4591
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | John Bokma <john@castleamber.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: vertical ordering of functions |
| Date | Tue, 03 May 2011 19:44:41 -0500 |
| Organization | Castle Amber |
| Lines | 20 |
| Message-ID | <87d3jzgupy.fsf@castleamber.com> (permalink) |
| References | <mailman.1127.1304460530.9059.python-list@python.org> <87sjsvfia2.fsf@benfinney.id.au> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| X-Trace | individual.net PrvkkNz2yBRFobCfDFRKpwAzMk5N0QM90bZEEyq0D9nj5qYd16 |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:bTTtXQXrLiwqViIXcA+fcCTvHhY= sha1:qOfhN4MPCPmqhLmBpJ5KvWRz/E0= |
| X-Url | http://johnbokma.com/ |
| User-Agent | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:4591 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> writes:
> Jabba Laci <jabba.laci@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Is there a convention for this? Should main() be at the top and called
>> function below?
>
> No, it's Python convention for both of those to be at the end of the
> module.
>
> I follow the convention described by Guido van Rossum in
> <URL:http://www.artima.com/weblogs/viewpost.jsp?thread=4829>.
Thanks Ben, very useful link.
--
John Bokma j3b
Blog: http://johnbokma.com/ Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/j.j.j.bokma
Freelance Perl & Python Development: http://castleamber.com/
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
vertical ordering of functions Jabba Laci <jabba.laci@gmail.com> - 2011-05-03 18:08 -0400
Re: vertical ordering of functions Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-05-04 09:58 +1000
Re: vertical ordering of functions John Bokma <john@castleamber.com> - 2011-05-03 19:44 -0500
Re: vertical ordering of functions Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2011-05-03 20:27 -0400
Re: vertical ordering of functions Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2011-05-04 01:09 +0000
Re: vertical ordering of functions John Roth <johnroth1@gmail.com> - 2011-05-04 04:14 -0700
Re: vertical ordering of functions Hans Georg Schaathun <hg@schaathun.net> - 2011-05-10 19:31 +0100
csiph-web