Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #4591

Re: vertical ordering of functions

Show all headers | View raw

Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> writes:

> Jabba Laci <jabba.laci@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Is there a convention for this? Should main() be at the top and called
>> function below?
>
> No, it's Python convention for both of those to be at the end of the
> module.
>
> I follow the convention described by Guido van Rossum in
> <URL:http://www.artima.com/weblogs/viewpost.jsp?thread=4829>.

Thanks Ben, very useful link.

-- 
John Bokma                                                               j3b

Blog: http://johnbokma.com/    Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/j.j.j.bokma
    Freelance Perl & Python Development: http://castleamber.com/

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

vertical ordering of functions Jabba Laci <jabba.laci@gmail.com> - 2011-05-03 18:08 -0400
  Re: vertical ordering of functions Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-05-04 09:58 +1000
    Re: vertical ordering of functions John Bokma <john@castleamber.com> - 2011-05-03 19:44 -0500
  Re: vertical ordering of functions Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2011-05-03 20:27 -0400
  Re: vertical ordering of functions Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2011-05-04 01:09 +0000
  Re: vertical ordering of functions John Roth <johnroth1@gmail.com> - 2011-05-04 04:14 -0700
  Re: vertical ordering of functions Hans Georg Schaathun <hg@schaathun.net> - 2011-05-10 19:31 +0100

csiph-web