Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #4594
| From | Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: vertical ordering of functions |
| Date | 2011-05-04 01:09 +0000 |
| Organization | PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC |
| Message-ID | <ipq90j$bud$1@reader1.panix.com> (permalink) |
| References | <mailman.1127.1304460530.9059.python-list@python.org> |
On 2011-05-03, Jabba Laci <jabba.laci@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm just reading Robert M. Martin's book entitled "Clean Code". In Ch. > 5 he says that a function that is called should be below a function > that does the calling. This creates a nice flow down from top to > bottom. I generally expect the opposite: callees above, callers below, main at the bottom. However, that's mostly just a habit left over from C programming where such an ordering avoids having to litter the file with forward declarations for functions. -- Grant
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
vertical ordering of functions Jabba Laci <jabba.laci@gmail.com> - 2011-05-03 18:08 -0400
Re: vertical ordering of functions Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-05-04 09:58 +1000
Re: vertical ordering of functions John Bokma <john@castleamber.com> - 2011-05-03 19:44 -0500
Re: vertical ordering of functions Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2011-05-03 20:27 -0400
Re: vertical ordering of functions Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2011-05-04 01:09 +0000
Re: vertical ordering of functions John Roth <johnroth1@gmail.com> - 2011-05-04 04:14 -0700
Re: vertical ordering of functions Hans Georg Schaathun <hg@schaathun.net> - 2011-05-10 19:31 +0100
csiph-web