Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #6378
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!teal.octanews.net!news-out.octanews.net!indigo.octanews.net!news.glorb.com!news.astraweb.com!border6.newsrouter.astraweb.com!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: Python's super() considered super! |
| References | <1f0d88bd-e2e6-4780-9d9e-784fb3f53837@k3g2000prl.googlegroups.com> <87wrhcapm2.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <02172345-6f3b-4fc6-9b88-1c546e3e480a@k15g2000pri.googlegroups.com> |
| X-Public-Key-ID | 0xAC128405 |
| X-Public-Key-Fingerprint | 517C F14B B2F3 98B0 CB35 4855 B8B2 4C06 AC12 8405 |
| X-Public-Key-URL | http://www.benfinney.id.au/contact/bfinney-pubkey.asc |
| X-Post-From | Ben Finney <bignose+hates-spam@benfinney.id.au> |
| Date | Fri, 27 May 2011 18:49:52 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <87boyoa5ov.fsf@benfinney.id.au> (permalink) |
| User-Agent | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:g3V7DDth9vThghQQ9CIhnPoVKPo= |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=utf-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| Lines | 15 |
| Organization | Unlimited download news at news.astraweb.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | b4d88be6.news.astraweb.com |
| X-Trace | DXC=R0D\>]0G<dMPn_2M35M[hOL?0kYOcDh@J7^o:UA4R?cES`HWH2Uf3?I]G;2>V^?kWCbEW9A[5UK?ENZ[SL`C\KgC`bgX=8Fc6bC |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:6378 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Raymond Hettinger <python@rcn.com> writes: > Hope you enjoyed the post. I certainly did. But I'm not better enlightened on why ‘super’ is a good thing. The exquisite care that you describe programmers needing to maintain is IMO just as much a deterrent as the super-is-harmful essay. -- \ “If you continue running Windows, your system may become | `\ unstable.” —Microsoft, Windows 95 bluescreen error message | _o__) | Ben Finney
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Python's super() considered super! Raymond Hettinger <python@rcn.com> - 2011-05-26 09:31 -0700
Re: Python's super() considered super! Raymond Hettinger <python@rcn.com> - 2011-05-26 09:39 -0700
Re: Python's super() considered super! Dotan Cohen <dotancohen@gmail.com> - 2011-05-26 21:13 +0300
Re: Python's super() considered super! Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-05-26 12:38 -0600
Re: Python's super() considered super! Dotan Cohen <dotancohen@gmail.com> - 2011-05-26 21:56 +0300
Re: Python's super() considered super! Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-05-26 16:15 -0400
Re: Python's super() considered super! Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-05-27 11:39 +1000
Re: Python's super() considered super! Raymond Hettinger <python@rcn.com> - 2011-05-27 00:16 -0700
Re: Python's super() considered super! Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-05-27 18:49 +1000
Re: Python's super() considered super! Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-05-27 10:37 +0000
Re: Python's super() considered super! Duncan Booth <duncan.booth@invalid.invalid> - 2011-05-27 10:53 +0000
Re: Python's super() considered super! Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-05-27 10:42 -0700
Re: Python's super() considered super! Duncan Booth <duncan.booth@invalid.invalid> - 2011-05-30 09:18 +0000
RE: Python's super() considered super! "Prasad, Ramit" <ramit.prasad@jpmchase.com> - 2011-05-27 14:10 -0400
Re: Python's super() considered super! Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-05-28 04:40 +1000
Re: Python's super() considered super! sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-05-27 07:27 -0700
Re: Python's super() considered super! Mel <mwilson@the-wire.com> - 2011-05-27 10:33 -0400
Re: Python's super() considered super! Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-05-27 14:49 +0000
Re: Python's super() considered super! harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-05-27 10:07 -0500
Re: Python's super() considered super! Duncan Booth <duncan.booth@invalid.invalid> - 2011-05-27 15:05 +0000
Re: Python's super() considered super! sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-05-27 08:24 -0700
Re: Python's super() considered super! sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-05-27 08:31 -0700
Re: Python's super() considered super! Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-05-27 16:06 +0000
Re: Python's super() considered super! Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml@behnel.de> - 2011-05-27 23:49 +0200
Re: Python's super() considered super! sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-05-27 16:57 -0700
Re: Python's super() considered super! Thomas Rachel <nutznetz-0c1b6768-bfa9-48d5-a470-7603bd3aa915@spamschutz.glglgl.de> - 2011-05-28 07:29 +0200
Re: Python's super() considered super! sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-05-27 17:04 -0700
Re: Python's super() considered super! Ryan Kelly <ryan@rfk.id.au> - 2011-05-28 09:57 +1000
Re: Python's super() considered super! sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-05-27 08:11 -0700
Re: Python's super() considered super! Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-05-27 12:31 -0600
Re: Python's super() considered super! Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-05-28 04:46 +1000
Re: Python's super() considered super! John Nagle <nagle@animats.com> - 2011-05-27 13:47 -0700
Re: Python's super() considered super! Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-05-27 15:24 -0700
csiph-web