Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #6399
| From | harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: Python's super() considered super! |
| References | <1f0d88bd-e2e6-4780-9d9e-784fb3f53837@k3g2000prl.googlegroups.com> <1632c707-3660-4248-97c4-3033c269574b@w21g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> <irocnm$ngd$1@speranza.aioe.org> <4ddfb9e4$0$29996$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> |
| Message-ID | <N6PDp.20543$241.5773@newsfe07.iad> (permalink) |
| Date | 2011-05-27 10:07 -0500 |
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>> Python causes trouble by letting the users get at the internals, but
>> > things like this make it worthwhile.
> Only if by "worthwhile" you mean "buggy as hell".
I *don't* believe this... the king of metaphors and bogus analogies
has come up with 'buggy as hell' !!?
No no, you might have buggy as grubs-under-a-damp-log, or buggy as
'moths-around-an-incandecent-lamp' , or you could have 'hot-as-hell,'
but 'buggy-as-hell' just doesn't say what needs say'in...
... I'm just saying....
:)
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Python's super() considered super! Raymond Hettinger <python@rcn.com> - 2011-05-26 09:31 -0700
Re: Python's super() considered super! Raymond Hettinger <python@rcn.com> - 2011-05-26 09:39 -0700
Re: Python's super() considered super! Dotan Cohen <dotancohen@gmail.com> - 2011-05-26 21:13 +0300
Re: Python's super() considered super! Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-05-26 12:38 -0600
Re: Python's super() considered super! Dotan Cohen <dotancohen@gmail.com> - 2011-05-26 21:56 +0300
Re: Python's super() considered super! Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-05-26 16:15 -0400
Re: Python's super() considered super! Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-05-27 11:39 +1000
Re: Python's super() considered super! Raymond Hettinger <python@rcn.com> - 2011-05-27 00:16 -0700
Re: Python's super() considered super! Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-05-27 18:49 +1000
Re: Python's super() considered super! Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-05-27 10:37 +0000
Re: Python's super() considered super! Duncan Booth <duncan.booth@invalid.invalid> - 2011-05-27 10:53 +0000
Re: Python's super() considered super! Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-05-27 10:42 -0700
Re: Python's super() considered super! Duncan Booth <duncan.booth@invalid.invalid> - 2011-05-30 09:18 +0000
RE: Python's super() considered super! "Prasad, Ramit" <ramit.prasad@jpmchase.com> - 2011-05-27 14:10 -0400
Re: Python's super() considered super! Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-05-28 04:40 +1000
Re: Python's super() considered super! sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-05-27 07:27 -0700
Re: Python's super() considered super! Mel <mwilson@the-wire.com> - 2011-05-27 10:33 -0400
Re: Python's super() considered super! Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-05-27 14:49 +0000
Re: Python's super() considered super! harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-05-27 10:07 -0500
Re: Python's super() considered super! Duncan Booth <duncan.booth@invalid.invalid> - 2011-05-27 15:05 +0000
Re: Python's super() considered super! sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-05-27 08:24 -0700
Re: Python's super() considered super! sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-05-27 08:31 -0700
Re: Python's super() considered super! Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-05-27 16:06 +0000
Re: Python's super() considered super! Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml@behnel.de> - 2011-05-27 23:49 +0200
Re: Python's super() considered super! sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-05-27 16:57 -0700
Re: Python's super() considered super! Thomas Rachel <nutznetz-0c1b6768-bfa9-48d5-a470-7603bd3aa915@spamschutz.glglgl.de> - 2011-05-28 07:29 +0200
Re: Python's super() considered super! sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-05-27 17:04 -0700
Re: Python's super() considered super! Ryan Kelly <ryan@rfk.id.au> - 2011-05-28 09:57 +1000
Re: Python's super() considered super! sturlamolden <sturlamolden@yahoo.no> - 2011-05-27 08:11 -0700
Re: Python's super() considered super! Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-05-27 12:31 -0600
Re: Python's super() considered super! Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-05-28 04:46 +1000
Re: Python's super() considered super! John Nagle <nagle@animats.com> - 2011-05-27 13:47 -0700
Re: Python's super() considered super! Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-05-27 15:24 -0700
csiph-web