Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.perl.misc > #8647
| From | Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.perl.misc |
| Subject | Re: this should work |
| Date | 2013-07-11 10:32 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <87a9ltqw5i.fsf@sapphire.mobileactivedefense.com> (permalink) |
| References | <krkm21$19jd$1@news.ntua.gr> <100720131549354102%jimsgibson@gmail.com> |
Jim Gibson <jimsgibson@gmail.com> writes:
[...]
> foreach my $dir (qw/commands_pre commands_post/) {
> my $tmpdir = "/tmp/$dir";
> print "$tmpdir\n"
> }
The perl compiler doesn't do invariant code motion because whether or
not some code is 'invariant' cannot generally be decided at compile
time. Because of this, the loop body above behave exactly as written
down: For each iteration, it creates a new my variable and assigns a
value to it. Unless there's a specific reason why this behaviour would
be desirable, such constructs should be avoided[*].
[*] This is also true for the more general case of 'Yes we can!'
variable declarations: Just because a new my variable can be created
as part of some construct doesn't mean there's a good reason why it
should be created, not only because this takes time but more
importantly, because it makes the code more complicated, especially as
real world code isn't going to have nice and small two lines blocks
but rather big and ugly 500 lines blocks with 5 hundred lines blocks
inside and each of these further subdivided into dozens of line
blocks (this is probably still and optimistic estimate). This makes
for extremely 'enjoyable' variable hunting ...
Back to comp.lang.perl.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
this should work "George Mpouras" <nospam.gravitalsun.antispam@spamno.hotmail.anispam.com.nospam> - 2013-07-11 01:08 +0300
Re: this should work Jim Gibson <jimsgibson@gmail.com> - 2013-07-10 15:49 -0700
Re: this should work George Mpouras <nospam.gravitalsun.noadsplease@hotmail.noads.com> - 2013-07-11 09:42 +0300
Re: this should work tmcd@panix.com (Tim McDaniel) - 2013-07-11 08:02 +0000
Re: this should work Ben Morrow <ben@morrow.me.uk> - 2013-07-11 12:45 +0100
Re: this should work George Mpouras <nospam.gravitalsun.noadsplease@hotmail.noads.com> - 2013-07-11 15:03 +0300
Re: this should work "Peter J. Holzer" <hjp-usenet3@hjp.at> - 2013-07-11 14:52 +0200
Re: this should work George Mpouras <nospam.gravitalsun.noadsplease@hotmail.noads.com> - 2013-07-11 16:01 +0300
Re: this should work Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2013-07-11 14:29 +0100
Re: this should work Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2013-07-11 14:27 +0100
Re: this should work Peter Makholm <peter@makholm.net> - 2013-07-11 15:50 +0200
Re: this should work Jürgen Exner <jurgenex@hotmail.com> - 2013-07-11 03:34 -0700
Re: this should work George Mpouras <nospam.gravitalsun.noadsplease@hotmail.noads.com> - 2013-07-11 13:55 +0300
Re: this should work Peter Makholm <peter@makholm.net> - 2013-07-11 13:57 +0200
Re: this should work Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz <spamtrap@library.lspace.org.invalid> - 2013-07-11 09:10 -0400
Re: this should work Ben Morrow <ben@morrow.me.uk> - 2013-07-11 21:35 +0100
Re: this should work Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2013-07-11 10:32 +0100
Re: this should work Ben Morrow <ben@morrow.me.uk> - 2013-07-11 12:51 +0100
Re: this should work Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2013-07-11 13:42 +0100
Re: this should work Ben Morrow <ben@morrow.me.uk> - 2013-07-11 16:23 +0100
Re: this should work Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2013-07-11 17:17 +0100
Re: this should work Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2013-07-11 18:08 +0100
Re: this should work Ben Morrow <ben@morrow.me.uk> - 2013-07-11 21:48 +0100
Re: this should work Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> - 2013-07-11 10:32 -0700
Re: this should work Jürgen Exner <jurgenex@hotmail.com> - 2013-07-11 10:48 -0700
Re: this should work "George Mpouras" <nospam.gravitalsun.antispam@spamno.hotmail.anispam.com.nospam> - 2013-07-11 21:38 +0300
Re: this should work Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2013-07-11 23:08 +0100
Re: this should work Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2013-07-11 18:48 +0100
Re: this should work Charles DeRykus <derykus@gmail.com> - 2013-07-11 12:03 -0700
Re: this should work Ben Morrow <ben@morrow.me.uk> - 2013-07-11 22:02 +0100
Re: this should work Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2013-07-11 23:06 +0100
Re: this should work Ben Morrow <ben@morrow.me.uk> - 2013-07-12 01:04 +0100
Re: this should work Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2013-07-15 13:41 +0100
Re: this should work Ben Morrow <ben@morrow.me.uk> - 2013-07-15 14:07 +0100
Re: this should work Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2013-07-15 15:05 +0100
Re: this should work Ben Morrow <ben@morrow.me.uk> - 2013-07-15 21:02 +0100
Re: this should work Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2013-07-15 23:58 +0100
Re: this should work tmcd@panix.com (Tim McDaniel) - 2013-07-15 17:23 +0000
Re: this should work Charlton Wilbur <cwilbur@chromatico.net> - 2013-07-15 15:40 -0400
Re: this should work Ben Morrow <ben@morrow.me.uk> - 2013-07-11 21:58 +0100
Re: this should work Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2013-07-11 23:17 +0100
[OT] scoping Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com> - 2013-07-12 07:50 +0000
Re: [OT] scoping aka 'new holes in old shoes' Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2013-07-12 11:53 +0100
[OT] engineering Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com> - 2013-07-15 11:37 +0000
Re: [OT] engineering Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2013-07-16 21:49 +0100
Re: [OT] engineering Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com> - 2013-07-17 09:27 +0000
Re: [OT] engineering Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2013-07-17 15:53 +0100
Re: [OT] engineering Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com> - 2013-07-22 10:36 +0000
Re: [OT] engineering Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz <spamtrap@library.lspace.org.invalid> - 2013-07-23 06:43 -0400
Re: [OT] engineering Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com> - 2013-07-22 10:38 +0000
Re: [OT] engineering Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2013-07-26 10:09 +0100
Re: [OT] scoping "Peter J. Holzer" <hjp-usenet3@hjp.at> - 2013-07-12 14:58 +0200
Re: [OT] scoping Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2013-07-12 15:50 +0100
Re: [OT] scoping Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz <spamtrap@library.lspace.org.invalid> - 2013-07-12 13:34 -0400
Re: [OT] scoping Ben Morrow <ben@morrow.me.uk> - 2013-07-12 22:04 +0100
Re: [OT] scoping Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2013-07-13 13:13 +0100
Re: [OT] scoping John Black <jblack@nospam.com> - 2013-07-13 20:01 -0500
Re: [OT] scoping Ben Morrow <ben@morrow.me.uk> - 2013-07-14 03:24 +0100
Re: [OT] scoping "Dr.Ruud" <rvtol+usenet@xs4all.nl> - 2013-07-14 10:49 +0200
Re: [OT] scoping Ben Morrow <ben@morrow.me.uk> - 2013-07-14 13:13 +0100
Re: [OT] scoping "Dr.Ruud" <rvtol+usenet@xs4all.nl> - 2013-07-14 17:02 +0200
Re: [OT] scoping Ben Morrow <ben@morrow.me.uk> - 2013-07-14 22:21 +0100
Re: [OT] scoping "Dr.Ruud" <rvtol+usenet@xs4all.nl> - 2013-07-15 02:21 +0200
Re: [OT] scoping Xho Jingleheimerschmidt <xhoster@gmail.com> - 2013-07-14 17:04 -0700
Re: [OT] scoping Ben Morrow <ben@morrow.me.uk> - 2013-07-15 14:12 +0100
Re: [OT] scoping tmcd@panix.com (Tim McDaniel) - 2013-07-14 15:11 +0000
Re: [OT] scoping "Dr.Ruud" <rvtol+usenet@xs4all.nl> - 2013-07-14 17:34 +0200
Re: [OT] scoping Xho Jingleheimerschmidt <xhoster@gmail.com> - 2013-07-14 15:34 -0700
Re: [OT] scoping Ben Morrow <ben@morrow.me.uk> - 2013-07-15 14:27 +0100
Re: [OT] scoping John Black <jblack@nospam.com> - 2013-07-14 23:48 -0500
Re: [OT] scoping Martijn Lievaart <m@rtij.nl.invlalid> - 2013-07-13 12:14 +0200
Re: this should work David Harmon <source@netcom.com> - 2013-07-11 10:02 -0700
Re: this should work Ben Morrow <ben@morrow.me.uk> - 2013-07-11 22:04 +0100
Re: this should work David Harmon <source@netcom.com> - 2013-07-12 09:34 -0700
Re: this should work Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2013-07-12 18:16 +0100
Re: this should work "Dr.Ruud" <rvtol+usenet@xs4all.nl> - 2013-07-12 15:44 +0200
Re: this should work David Harmon <source@netcom.com> - 2013-07-12 15:53 -0700
Re: this should work Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz <spamtrap@library.lspace.org.invalid> - 2013-07-11 09:14 -0400
Re: this should work "George Mpouras" <nospam.gravitalsun.antispam@spamno.hotmail.anispam.com.nospam> - 2013-07-11 19:45 +0300
csiph-web