Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #7990

Re: calling function within (function() {...})();

Show all headers | View raw

Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> writes:

> Eric Bednarz wrote:
>
>> Gregor Kofler <usenet@gregorkofler.com> writes:
>>> Am 2011-11-04 13:18, Andrew Poulos meinte:

>>>> var x = (function(){
>>>>              return {
>>>>                a : function(){},
>>>>                b : function(){}
>>>>              };
>>>>           })();

>> var x = (function () {
>>     function a() {
>>         b();
>>     }
>>     function b() {
>> 
>>     }
>>     return {
>>         a: a,
>>         b: b
>>     };
>> }());
>
> There is no inherent advantage in that.  In fact, it is slightly less 
> efficient than the original code because the `a' and `b' identifiers need to 
> be resolved first,

If a, b[, n] are used a lot in a context where they need not be methods
of an object, it would seem futile (and – depending on the number of
calls – quite inefficient) to me to call them as methods of an object
nevertheless.

>> window.setTimeout(x.a, 0);
>
>  window.setTimeout(function() { x.a(); }, 10);

You don’t say (I suppose creating a superfluous function object is
justified by not resolving those pesky identifiers first :^)

> The asynchronous call is unnecessary here, though.

That’s the problem of all artificial example code. In the origignal
code, calling a function expression that does nothing but returning an
object was unnecessary, too.

-- 
λ

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

calling function within (function() {...})(); Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-04 23:18 +1100
  Re: calling function within (function() {...})(); Gregor Kofler <usenet@gregorkofler.com> - 2011-11-04 14:06 +0100
    Re: calling function within (function() {...})(); Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2011-11-04 14:13 +0100
      Re: calling function within (function() {...})(); Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-11-04 15:49 +0100
        Re: calling function within (function() {...})(); Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2011-11-04 16:35 +0100
          Re: calling function within (function() {...})(); Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-11-04 20:44 +0100
            Re: calling function within (function() {...})(); Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2011-11-04 21:16 +0100
              Re: calling function within (function() {...})(); Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-11-04 21:24 +0100
                Re: calling function within (function() {...})(); Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-11-04 21:46 +0100
                Re: calling function within (function() {...})(); Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2011-11-04 23:29 +0100
        Re: calling function within (function() {...})(); Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2011-11-04 10:29 -0700
          Re: calling function within (function() {...})(); Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-11-09 15:17 +0100
            Re: calling function within (function() {...})(); Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2011-11-09 20:13 +0100
              Re: calling function within (function() {...})(); Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-11-11 23:26 +0100
                Re: calling function within (function() {...})(); Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2011-11-11 23:31 +0100
                Re: calling function within (function() {...})(); Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-11-12 00:38 +0100

csiph-web