Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #8008

Re: calling function within (function() {...})();

From Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org>
Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
Subject Re: calling function within (function() {...})();
Date 2011-11-04 21:16 +0100
Organization Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs
Message-ID <m2pqh71w4b.fsf@nntp.bednarz.nl> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <j90o0s$vmv$1@dont-email.me> <m21utoav44.fsf@nntp.bednarz.nl> <8928443.SEqChMirdb@PointedEars.de> <m2wrbfaoiv.fsf@nntp.bednarz.nl> <2999240.SPkdTlGXAF@PointedEars.de>

Show all headers | View raw


Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> writes:

> Eric Bednarz wrote:

>>>> window.setTimeout(x.a, 0);
>>>
>>>  window.setTimeout(function() { x.a(); }, 10);
>> 
>> You don’t say (I suppose creating a superfluous function object is
>> justified by not resolving those pesky identifiers first :^)
>
> The Function instance is not superfluous.  If you do not use the function 
> expression here, then only the reference to `x.a' will be called, which 
> means that `x.a' will be called as a method of the object that `window' 
> refers to, or if you will, the global object.  As a result, `this' in `x.a' 
> would not refer to the same object as `x', but to the other object.

That’s why I provided that example. I don’t know what makes you think
that you have to explain that (or what the ‘module pattern’ is) to me.

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

calling function within (function() {...})(); Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-04 23:18 +1100
  Re: calling function within (function() {...})(); Gregor Kofler <usenet@gregorkofler.com> - 2011-11-04 14:06 +0100
    Re: calling function within (function() {...})(); Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2011-11-04 14:13 +0100
      Re: calling function within (function() {...})(); Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-11-04 15:49 +0100
        Re: calling function within (function() {...})(); Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2011-11-04 16:35 +0100
          Re: calling function within (function() {...})(); Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-11-04 20:44 +0100
            Re: calling function within (function() {...})(); Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2011-11-04 21:16 +0100
              Re: calling function within (function() {...})(); Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-11-04 21:24 +0100
                Re: calling function within (function() {...})(); Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-11-04 21:46 +0100
                Re: calling function within (function() {...})(); Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2011-11-04 23:29 +0100
        Re: calling function within (function() {...})(); Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2011-11-04 10:29 -0700
          Re: calling function within (function() {...})(); Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-11-09 15:17 +0100
            Re: calling function within (function() {...})(); Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2011-11-09 20:13 +0100
              Re: calling function within (function() {...})(); Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-11-11 23:26 +0100
                Re: calling function within (function() {...})(); Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2011-11-11 23:31 +0100
                Re: calling function within (function() {...})(); Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-11-12 00:38 +0100

csiph-web