Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #8243
| Message-ID | <8931189.SEqChMirdb@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Date | 2011-11-11 23:26 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: calling function within (function() {...})(); |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| References | (2 earlier) <m21utoav44.fsf@nntp.bednarz.nl> <8928443.SEqChMirdb@PointedEars.de> <c33a9a84-24ce-4a09-9935-0ed910fab9ea@x8g2000yql.googlegroups.com> <2015534.YEL58v44cs@PointedEars.de> <m2ipmt1542.fsf@nntp.bednarz.nl> |
| Followup-To | comp.lang.javascript |
Followups directed to: comp.lang.javascript
Eric Bednarz wrote: > Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> writes: >> [function declarations vs. methods in ‘private’ scope] >> Any potential safety gained this way only mitigates the unnecessary, >> potentially harmful dependency introduced by Eric with the closure (by >> contrast to the rather clean, original code). > > The whole purpose of the clean, original code was to introduce closures > at some point. Apparently you have either not read or not understood the FAQ notes. Yes, introducing a closure was the intent of the original code. A useful one. *One*. > Well, either that, or there was a useless – albeit refreshingly clean – > function expression. You are still missing the point. >> It should be this.b(), >> not x.b(). > > It must be exhausting, having all those opinions. :-) Ignorance must be bliss. PointedEars -- Use any version of Microsoft Frontpage to create your site. (This won't prevent people from viewing your source, but no one will want to steal it.) -- from <http://www.vortex-webdesign.com/help/hidesource.htm> (404-comp.)
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
calling function within (function() {...})(); Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-04 23:18 +1100
Re: calling function within (function() {...})(); Gregor Kofler <usenet@gregorkofler.com> - 2011-11-04 14:06 +0100
Re: calling function within (function() {...})(); Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2011-11-04 14:13 +0100
Re: calling function within (function() {...})(); Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-11-04 15:49 +0100
Re: calling function within (function() {...})(); Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2011-11-04 16:35 +0100
Re: calling function within (function() {...})(); Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-11-04 20:44 +0100
Re: calling function within (function() {...})(); Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2011-11-04 21:16 +0100
Re: calling function within (function() {...})(); Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-11-04 21:24 +0100
Re: calling function within (function() {...})(); Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-11-04 21:46 +0100
Re: calling function within (function() {...})(); Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2011-11-04 23:29 +0100
Re: calling function within (function() {...})(); Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2011-11-04 10:29 -0700
Re: calling function within (function() {...})(); Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-11-09 15:17 +0100
Re: calling function within (function() {...})(); Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2011-11-09 20:13 +0100
Re: calling function within (function() {...})(); Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-11-11 23:26 +0100
Re: calling function within (function() {...})(); Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2011-11-11 23:31 +0100
Re: calling function within (function() {...})(); Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-11-12 00:38 +0100
csiph-web