Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #8114

Re: multi browser forms issue

Message-ID <9716086.hkaJUJhadI@PointedEars.de> (permalink)
From Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Organization PointedEars Software (PES)
Date 2011-11-07 23:26 +0100
Subject Re: multi browser forms issue
Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
References <a9622d31-d06a-4886-8a6d-b90e8a1781ef@o19g2000vbk.googlegroups.com> <6b248eda-8b2d-4618-af26-d3983cdcdbb1@u10g2000prl.googlegroups.com> <m2y5vsnl21.fsf@nntp.bednarz.nl> <858f3485-5cf5-41f1-b4be-e8619d3ac867@k38g2000pro.googlegroups.com> <m2mxc7mvs3.fsf@nntp.bednarz.nl>
Followup-To comp.lang.javascript

Followups directed to: comp.lang.javascript

Show all headers | View raw


Eric Bednarz wrote:

> David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> writes:
>> Eric Bednarz wrote:
>>>>> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
>>>>
>>>> That's not right for HTML5.
>>>
>>> There seem to be quite some things eluding you, too…
>>
>> Wrong. Once again, I am pointing out how silly it is to transplant an
>> HTML5 doctype onto a document that is clearly not HTML5.
> 
> By making bullshit statements? Oh well. I guess you win :-)

There are two ways to approach this problem.  One, to assume HTML5 was 
intended and some things in the document need to be fixed to make that Valid 
HTML5.  Two, to assume HTML5 was not intended and some sort of "cargo cult" 
that you have been talking about earlier made the author believe that this 
was the way to do things.

Given the fact that in this document the `script' element resides between 
`head' and `body' element, and that it contains attempts, with
javascript:-URI driven scripting in place of a submit button, to submit a 
form by ID that has only a name specified, what do you think is the more 
reasonable approach here?


PointedEars
-- 
Anyone who slaps a 'this page is best viewed with Browser X' label on
a Web page appears to be yearning for the bad old days, before the Web,
when you had very little chance of reading a document written on another
computer, another word processor, or another network. -- Tim Berners-Lee

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

multi browser forms issue Dizzee <slightlyandy@gmail.com> - 2011-11-06 14:07 -0800
  Re: multi browser forms issue Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2011-11-06 22:38 +0000
  Re: multi browser forms issue David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2011-11-07 04:40 -0800
    Re: multi browser forms issue Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2011-11-07 14:01 +0100
      Re: multi browser forms issue Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-11-07 14:13 +0100
        Re: multi browser forms issue Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2011-11-07 14:58 +0100
          Re: multi browser forms issue Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-11-07 15:51 +0100
      Re: multi browser forms issue "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> - 2011-11-07 16:08 +0200
      Re: multi browser forms issue David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2011-11-07 13:05 -0800
        Re: multi browser forms issue Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2011-11-07 23:07 +0100
          Re: multi browser forms issue Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-11-07 23:26 +0100
            Re: multi browser forms issue Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2011-11-09 20:17 +0100
              Re: multi browser forms issue Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-11-10 18:42 +0100
                Re: multi browser forms issue Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2011-11-11 23:38 +0100

csiph-web