Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #8114
| Message-ID | <9716086.hkaJUJhadI@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Date | 2011-11-07 23:26 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: multi browser forms issue |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| References | <a9622d31-d06a-4886-8a6d-b90e8a1781ef@o19g2000vbk.googlegroups.com> <6b248eda-8b2d-4618-af26-d3983cdcdbb1@u10g2000prl.googlegroups.com> <m2y5vsnl21.fsf@nntp.bednarz.nl> <858f3485-5cf5-41f1-b4be-e8619d3ac867@k38g2000pro.googlegroups.com> <m2mxc7mvs3.fsf@nntp.bednarz.nl> |
| Followup-To | comp.lang.javascript |
Followups directed to: comp.lang.javascript
Eric Bednarz wrote: > David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> writes: >> Eric Bednarz wrote: >>>>> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"> >>>> >>>> That's not right for HTML5. >>> >>> There seem to be quite some things eluding you, too… >> >> Wrong. Once again, I am pointing out how silly it is to transplant an >> HTML5 doctype onto a document that is clearly not HTML5. > > By making bullshit statements? Oh well. I guess you win :-) There are two ways to approach this problem. One, to assume HTML5 was intended and some things in the document need to be fixed to make that Valid HTML5. Two, to assume HTML5 was not intended and some sort of "cargo cult" that you have been talking about earlier made the author believe that this was the way to do things. Given the fact that in this document the `script' element resides between `head' and `body' element, and that it contains attempts, with javascript:-URI driven scripting in place of a submit button, to submit a form by ID that has only a name specified, what do you think is the more reasonable approach here? PointedEars -- Anyone who slaps a 'this page is best viewed with Browser X' label on a Web page appears to be yearning for the bad old days, before the Web, when you had very little chance of reading a document written on another computer, another word processor, or another network. -- Tim Berners-Lee
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
multi browser forms issue Dizzee <slightlyandy@gmail.com> - 2011-11-06 14:07 -0800
Re: multi browser forms issue Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2011-11-06 22:38 +0000
Re: multi browser forms issue David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2011-11-07 04:40 -0800
Re: multi browser forms issue Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2011-11-07 14:01 +0100
Re: multi browser forms issue Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-11-07 14:13 +0100
Re: multi browser forms issue Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2011-11-07 14:58 +0100
Re: multi browser forms issue Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-11-07 15:51 +0100
Re: multi browser forms issue "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> - 2011-11-07 16:08 +0200
Re: multi browser forms issue David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2011-11-07 13:05 -0800
Re: multi browser forms issue Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2011-11-07 23:07 +0100
Re: multi browser forms issue Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-11-07 23:26 +0100
Re: multi browser forms issue Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2011-11-09 20:17 +0100
Re: multi browser forms issue Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-11-10 18:42 +0100
Re: multi browser forms issue Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2011-11-11 23:38 +0100
csiph-web