Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #8204

Re: multi browser forms issue

Message-ID <1481913.n2Sy7kCIUo@PointedEars.de> (permalink)
From Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Organization PointedEars Software (PES)
Date 2011-11-10 18:42 +0100
Subject Re: multi browser forms issue
Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
References (2 earlier) <m2y5vsnl21.fsf@nntp.bednarz.nl> <858f3485-5cf5-41f1-b4be-e8619d3ac867@k38g2000pro.googlegroups.com> <m2mxc7mvs3.fsf@nntp.bednarz.nl> <9716086.hkaJUJhadI@PointedEars.de> <m2ehxh14ww.fsf@nntp.bednarz.nl>
Followup-To comp.lang.javascript

Followups directed to: comp.lang.javascript

Show all headers | View raw


Eric Bednarz wrote:

> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> writes:
>> Eric Bednarz wrote:
>>> David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> writes:
>>>> Eric Bednarz wrote:
>>>>>>> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
>>>>>> That's not right for HTML5.
>>>>> There seem to be quite some things eluding you, too…
>>>> Wrong. Once again, I am pointing out how silly it is to transplant an
>>>> HTML5 doctype onto a document that is clearly not HTML5.
>>> By making bullshit statements? Oh well. I guess you win :-)
>> There are two ways to approach this problem.
> 
> Possibly. For me, however, there is but one. I comment exactly on what I
> quote and call shenanigans when appropriate.

Ignoring the context of a statement and then attacking the person making the 
statement (instead of the statement) on those grounds constitutes a number 
of common fallacies.

HTML5 was declared (with what is known as "doctype" per the current HTML5 
Working Draft), but was evidently not used in the rest of the document.  
Calling a statement that points this out a "bullshit statement" is 
inappropriate by any reasonable measure.


PointedEars
-- 
When all you know is jQuery, every problem looks $olvable.

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

multi browser forms issue Dizzee <slightlyandy@gmail.com> - 2011-11-06 14:07 -0800
  Re: multi browser forms issue Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2011-11-06 22:38 +0000
  Re: multi browser forms issue David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2011-11-07 04:40 -0800
    Re: multi browser forms issue Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2011-11-07 14:01 +0100
      Re: multi browser forms issue Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-11-07 14:13 +0100
        Re: multi browser forms issue Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2011-11-07 14:58 +0100
          Re: multi browser forms issue Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-11-07 15:51 +0100
      Re: multi browser forms issue "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> - 2011-11-07 16:08 +0200
      Re: multi browser forms issue David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2011-11-07 13:05 -0800
        Re: multi browser forms issue Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2011-11-07 23:07 +0100
          Re: multi browser forms issue Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-11-07 23:26 +0100
            Re: multi browser forms issue Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2011-11-09 20:17 +0100
              Re: multi browser forms issue Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-11-10 18:42 +0100
                Re: multi browser forms issue Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2011-11-11 23:38 +0100

csiph-web