Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #10948

JNLP gotchas

Path csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject JNLP gotchas
Date Thu, 22 Dec 2011 06:43:15 -0800
Organization Canadian Mind Products
Lines 17
Message-ID <sdg6f7pml2vl92i3c5cgihei07q4rvr0os@4ax.com> (permalink)
Reply-To Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid>
NNTP-Posting-Host Z2l1DcCELS0rATq8NqV4Sw.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Complaints-To abuse@aioe.org
X-Notice Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
X-Newsreader Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186
Xref x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:10948

Show key headers only | View raw


I was reading over the latest spec, and it seems to me, there are
still two gotchas.

There does not appear to be a way to request the 32-bit windows
version of the JVM. If you only have 32-bit JNI, often it will attempt
to use the 64-bit version and fail.

There is no naming convention to keep track of whether a Windows DLL
(Dynamic Link Library) is 32-bit or 64-bit.

Do you agree?
-- 
Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products
http://mindprod.com
If you can't remember the name of some method, 
consider changing it to something you can remember.
 

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

JNLP gotchas Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-12-22 06:43 -0800
  Re: JNLP gotchas Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-12-22 14:18 -0800
  Re: JNLP gotchas Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-12-22 21:09 -0500

csiph-web