Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #10948 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2011-12-22 06:43 -0800 |
| Last post | 2011-12-22 21:09 -0500 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.java.programmer
JNLP gotchas Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-12-22 06:43 -0800
Re: JNLP gotchas Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-12-22 14:18 -0800
Re: JNLP gotchas Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-12-22 21:09 -0500
| From | Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-12-22 06:43 -0800 |
| Subject | JNLP gotchas |
| Message-ID | <sdg6f7pml2vl92i3c5cgihei07q4rvr0os@4ax.com> |
I was reading over the latest spec, and it seems to me, there are still two gotchas. There does not appear to be a way to request the 32-bit windows version of the JVM. If you only have 32-bit JNI, often it will attempt to use the 64-bit version and fail. There is no naming convention to keep track of whether a Windows DLL (Dynamic Link Library) is 32-bit or 64-bit. Do you agree? -- Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products http://mindprod.com If you can't remember the name of some method, consider changing it to something you can remember.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-12-22 14:18 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <e4b7f75e5kerc6uk6s7urm96s6hi3q1cuj@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #10948 |
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 06:43:15 -0800, Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said : > >There is no naming convention to keep track of whether a Windows DLL >(Dynamic Link Library) is 32-bit or 64-bit. The one tool you do have is the arch parameter which you set to x86 for 32-bit and amd64 for 64-bit. -- Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products http://mindprod.com If you can't remember the name of some method, consider changing it to something you can remember.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-12-22 21:09 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <4ef3e2e8$0$284$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> |
| In reply to | #10948 |
On 12/22/2011 9:43 AM, Roedy Green wrote: > I was reading over the latest spec, and it seems to me, there are > still two gotchas. > > There does not appear to be a way to request the 32-bit windows > version of the JVM. If you only have 32-bit JNI, often it will attempt > to use the 64-bit version and fail. \whereveryouinstalled64bitjava\bin\java \whereveryouinstalled32bitjava\bin\java should work fine. > There is no naming convention to keep track of whether a Windows DLL > (Dynamic Link Library) is 32-bit or 64-bit. There are no naming convention, but the info is available in the header. Arne
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.java.programmer
csiph-web