Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #10948 > unrolled thread

JNLP gotchas

Started byRoedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid>
First post2011-12-22 06:43 -0800
Last post2011-12-22 21:09 -0500
Articles 3 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.java.programmer


Contents

  JNLP gotchas Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-12-22 06:43 -0800
    Re: JNLP gotchas Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-12-22 14:18 -0800
    Re: JNLP gotchas Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-12-22 21:09 -0500

#10948 — JNLP gotchas

FromRoedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid>
Date2011-12-22 06:43 -0800
SubjectJNLP gotchas
Message-ID<sdg6f7pml2vl92i3c5cgihei07q4rvr0os@4ax.com>
I was reading over the latest spec, and it seems to me, there are
still two gotchas.

There does not appear to be a way to request the 32-bit windows
version of the JVM. If you only have 32-bit JNI, often it will attempt
to use the 64-bit version and fail.

There is no naming convention to keep track of whether a Windows DLL
(Dynamic Link Library) is 32-bit or 64-bit.

Do you agree?
-- 
Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products
http://mindprod.com
If you can't remember the name of some method, 
consider changing it to something you can remember.
 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#10960

FromRoedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid>
Date2011-12-22 14:18 -0800
Message-ID<e4b7f75e5kerc6uk6s7urm96s6hi3q1cuj@4ax.com>
In reply to#10948
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 06:43:15 -0800, Roedy Green
<see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted
someone who said :

>
>There is no naming convention to keep track of whether a Windows DLL
>(Dynamic Link Library) is 32-bit or 64-bit.

The one tool you do have is the arch parameter which you set to x86
for 32-bit and amd64 for 64-bit.
-- 
Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products
http://mindprod.com
If you can't remember the name of some method, 
consider changing it to something you can remember.
 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#10963

FromArne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk>
Date2011-12-22 21:09 -0500
Message-ID<4ef3e2e8$0$284$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
In reply to#10948
On 12/22/2011 9:43 AM, Roedy Green wrote:
> I was reading over the latest spec, and it seems to me, there are
> still two gotchas.
>
> There does not appear to be a way to request the 32-bit windows
> version of the JVM. If you only have 32-bit JNI, often it will attempt
> to use the 64-bit version and fail.

\whereveryouinstalled64bitjava\bin\java
\whereveryouinstalled32bitjava\bin\java

should work fine.

> There is no naming convention to keep track of whether a Windows DLL
> (Dynamic Link Library) is 32-bit or 64-bit.

There are no naming convention, but the info is available in
the header.

Arne

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.java.programmer


csiph-web