Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #10963

Re: JNLP gotchas

Date	2011-12-22 21:09 -0500
From	Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	Re: JNLP gotchas
References	<sdg6f7pml2vl92i3c5cgihei07q4rvr0os@4ax.com>
Message-ID	<4ef3e2e8$0$284$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> (permalink)
Organization	SunSITE.dk - Supporting Open source

Show all headers | View raw

On 12/22/2011 9:43 AM, Roedy Green wrote:
> I was reading over the latest spec, and it seems to me, there are
> still two gotchas.
>
> There does not appear to be a way to request the 32-bit windows
> version of the JVM. If you only have 32-bit JNI, often it will attempt
> to use the 64-bit version and fail.

\whereveryouinstalled64bitjava\bin\java
\whereveryouinstalled32bitjava\bin\java

should work fine.

> There is no naming convention to keep track of whether a Windows DLL
> (Dynamic Link Library) is 32-bit or 64-bit.

There are no naming convention, but the info is available in
the header.

Arne

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

JNLP gotchas Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-12-22 06:43 -0800
  Re: JNLP gotchas Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-12-22 14:18 -0800
  Re: JNLP gotchas Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-12-22 21:09 -0500

csiph-web