Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #14643
| From | "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Bicubic interpolation suddenly is no better than bilinear. |
| Date | 2012-05-19 07:26 -0400 |
| Organization | The Wasteland |
| Message-ID | <nospam-B8112C.07265719052012@news.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <d389e99e-2fc7-40dd-b07d-90140db4f380@w19g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> |
In article <d389e99e-2fc7-40dd-b07d-90140db4f380@w19g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, Dangling Pointer <dpointer2@gmail.com> wrote: > For some reason, I'm suddenly seeing bilinear filtering when using > TYPE_BICUBIC filtering with AffineTransformOp in Java2D. This change > happened without my changing the Java version (1.6.0_24) being used! > What could be causing this, and how do I fix it? How is the AffineTransformOp constructed? What is the result of getInterpolationType()? -- John B. Matthews trashgod at gmail dot com <http://sites.google.com/site/drjohnbmatthews>
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bicubic interpolation suddenly is no better than bilinear. Dangling Pointer <dpointer2@gmail.com> - 2012-05-18 22:58 -0700
Re: Bicubic interpolation suddenly is no better than bilinear. Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-05-18 23:12 -0700
Re: Bicubic interpolation suddenly is no better than bilinear. Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-05-20 22:23 -0700
Re: Bicubic interpolation suddenly is no better than bilinear. "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-05-19 07:26 -0400
Re: Bicubic interpolation suddenly is no better than bilinear. Dangling Pointer <dpointer2@gmail.com> - 2012-05-19 08:07 -0700
Re: Bicubic interpolation suddenly is no better than bilinear. Dangling Pointer <dpointer2@gmail.com> - 2012-05-19 09:13 -0700
Re: Bicubic interpolation suddenly is no better than bilinear. Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2012-05-19 20:48 +0200
Re: Bicubic interpolation suddenly is no better than bilinear. "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-05-20 09:02 -0400
Re: Bicubic interpolation suddenly is no better than bilinear. BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-20 11:59 -0500
csiph-web