Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #14712
| From | Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Bicubic interpolation suddenly is no better than bilinear. |
| Date | 2012-05-20 22:23 -0700 |
| Organization | Canadian Mind Products |
| Message-ID | <j9kjr71bpbgg8ikop6o87b23fj34cmdsr1@4ax.com> (permalink) |
| References | <d389e99e-2fc7-40dd-b07d-90140db4f380@w19g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <d9eer7ppi96umu526dpc6kanci6nd0hkgd@4ax.com> |
On Fri, 18 May 2012 23:12:32 -0700, Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said : >You are claiming a "virgin birth" here. Nothing charged, yet the >program gave different results. What could possibly have changed? You are aware that any time you change a constant, you must do a clean compile to propagate the value to all classes. -- Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products http://mindprod.com "Plants" with "leaves" no more efficient than today's solar cells could out-compete real plants, crowding the biosphere with an inedible foliage. Tough omnivorous "bacteria" could out-compete real bacteria: They could spread like blowing pollen, replicate swiftly, and reduce the biosphere to dust in a matter of days. Dangerous replicators could easily be too tough, small, and rapidly spreading to stop -- at least if we make no preparation. We have trouble enough controlling viruses and fruit flies. ~ Eric Drexler (born: 1955-04-25 age: 57) Engines of Creation: The Coming Era of Nanotechnology. .
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bicubic interpolation suddenly is no better than bilinear. Dangling Pointer <dpointer2@gmail.com> - 2012-05-18 22:58 -0700
Re: Bicubic interpolation suddenly is no better than bilinear. Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-05-18 23:12 -0700
Re: Bicubic interpolation suddenly is no better than bilinear. Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-05-20 22:23 -0700
Re: Bicubic interpolation suddenly is no better than bilinear. "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-05-19 07:26 -0400
Re: Bicubic interpolation suddenly is no better than bilinear. Dangling Pointer <dpointer2@gmail.com> - 2012-05-19 08:07 -0700
Re: Bicubic interpolation suddenly is no better than bilinear. Dangling Pointer <dpointer2@gmail.com> - 2012-05-19 09:13 -0700
Re: Bicubic interpolation suddenly is no better than bilinear. Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2012-05-19 20:48 +0200
Re: Bicubic interpolation suddenly is no better than bilinear. "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-05-20 09:02 -0400
Re: Bicubic interpolation suddenly is no better than bilinear. BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-20 11:59 -0500
csiph-web