Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #14639
| From | Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Bicubic interpolation suddenly is no better than bilinear. |
| Date | 2012-05-18 23:12 -0700 |
| Organization | Canadian Mind Products |
| Message-ID | <d9eer7ppi96umu526dpc6kanci6nd0hkgd@4ax.com> (permalink) |
| References | <d389e99e-2fc7-40dd-b07d-90140db4f380@w19g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> |
On Fri, 18 May 2012 22:58:38 -0700 (PDT), Dangling Pointer <dpointer2@gmail.com> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said : >For some reason, I'm suddenly seeing bilinear filtering when using >TYPE_BICUBIC filtering with AffineTransformOp in Java2D. This change >happened without my changing the Java version (1.6.0_24) being used! >What could be causing this, and how do I fix it? You are claiming a "virgin birth" here. Nothing charged, yet the program gave different results. What could possibly have changed? Do you have two different jars? two different JVMs? Some sort of config file? Is there any use of Random number generators in your code? Can your restore from backup and see the old behaviour, and then compare files till you see what changed? -- Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products http://mindprod.com "Plants" with "leaves" no more efficient than today's solar cells could out-compete real plants, crowding the biosphere with an inedible foliage. Tough omnivorous "bacteria" could out-compete real bacteria: They could spread like blowing pollen, replicate swiftly, and reduce the biosphere to dust in a matter of days. Dangerous replicators could easily be too tough, small, and rapidly spreading to stop -- at least if we make no preparation. We have trouble enough controlling viruses and fruit flies. ~ Eric Drexler (born: 1955-04-25 age: 57) Engines of Creation: The Coming Era of Nanotechnology. .
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bicubic interpolation suddenly is no better than bilinear. Dangling Pointer <dpointer2@gmail.com> - 2012-05-18 22:58 -0700
Re: Bicubic interpolation suddenly is no better than bilinear. Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-05-18 23:12 -0700
Re: Bicubic interpolation suddenly is no better than bilinear. Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-05-20 22:23 -0700
Re: Bicubic interpolation suddenly is no better than bilinear. "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-05-19 07:26 -0400
Re: Bicubic interpolation suddenly is no better than bilinear. Dangling Pointer <dpointer2@gmail.com> - 2012-05-19 08:07 -0700
Re: Bicubic interpolation suddenly is no better than bilinear. Dangling Pointer <dpointer2@gmail.com> - 2012-05-19 09:13 -0700
Re: Bicubic interpolation suddenly is no better than bilinear. Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2012-05-19 20:48 +0200
Re: Bicubic interpolation suddenly is no better than bilinear. "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-05-20 09:02 -0400
Re: Bicubic interpolation suddenly is no better than bilinear. BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-20 11:59 -0500
csiph-web