Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #25617

Re: Why “new”?

Date 2011-02-07 15:48 +0800
From Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: Why “new”?
References (6 earlier) <iilid3$48g$1@news.eternal-september.org> <p8x3p.20341$g96.17119@newsfe15.iad> <4d4f6434$1@news.x-privat.org> <ILednQuTBIQh-9LQnZ2dnUVZ_omdnZ2d@posted.palinacquisition> <4d4f6ae3$1@news.x-privat.org>
Message-ID <m8ednZJGneokPtLQnZ2dnUVZ_gOdnZ2d@posted.palinacquisition> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


On 2/7/11 11:45 AM, Ken Wesson wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 11:27:56 +0800, Peter Duniho wrote:
>
>> On 2/7/11 11:17 AM, Ken Wesson wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>> J has arguably helped with that. Some. Fact is, if you apply yourself
>>>> to learning and using J then it's not line-noise at all, it's just
>>>> extremely terse. It's not symbol cruft in the same sense that Perl is.
>>>
>>> And what, pray tell, is J?
>>
>> http://www.lmgtfy.com/
>
> That is needlessly snarky. It's not as if one can google a one-letter
> query and expect a useful result.

I note that you clipped the _useful_ part of the URL I offered.

If one is so inept at web searches that they cannot be bothered to add 
relevant terms that are obvious from the context in order to produce a 
useful result, then yes…I can see how that might cause a problem.  But 
such a person probably should not be involved in programming in any way.

Pete

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: Why “new”? Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-02-07 15:48 +0800
  Re: Why “new”? Ken Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com> - 2011-02-08 12:30 +0100
    Re: Why “new”? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-08 22:58 -0500
  Re: Why “new”? blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm@myrealbox.com> - 2011-02-09 15:31 +0000
  Re: Why “new”? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-07 19:10 -0500
  Re: Why “new”? Ken Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com> - 2011-02-08 12:17 +0100
    Re: Why “new”? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-08 23:05 -0500
    Re: Why “new”? Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-02-08 20:24 +0800
  Re: Why “new”? Ken Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com> - 2011-02-07 09:18 +0100

csiph-web