Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #18801
| From | Mark <i@dontgetlotsofspamanymore.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: demise of sun.com |
| Date | 2012-09-17 10:28 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <m7rd58dh1dir8b30kltplg2tulhcp5f0cr@4ax.com> (permalink) |
| References | <80d858l76kch632v7gdefamcecl18a646t@4ax.com> <821958dsvuebbng74ded6o3g436al8iktj@4ax.com> |
On Sat, 15 Sep 2012 08:27:44 -0700, Roedy Green
<see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> wrote:
>On Sat, 15 Sep 2012 00:54:47 -0700, Roedy Green
><see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted
>someone who said :
>
>>Oracle has dropped dozens of links on sun.com without providing
>>redirects to oracle.com. I am doing my best to find replacements, but
>>I suspect a fair bit of material is going to disappear.
>
>all these links now just go to a generic Java page:
-snip-
>It is a common thing for a webmaster to reorganise a website. The
>catch is the links into that website then stop working. Ideally the
>webmaster should set up permanent redirects from the old URL to the
>new to inform everyone of where their old pages went and to keep the
>old links working. However, companies such as Oracle do not do this.
>They prefer to force the hundreds of websites that link into them to
>individually research the links with Google to find the new ones or
>delete them. Obviously the total amount of work is thousands of times
>greater, but they don't care. It is not them doing the work, it is the
>companies who send them business. Mindless next-quarter capitalism
>demands this sort of behaviour.
This is particularly annoying when you search for a problem and find a
'solution' in a forum, which is just a link to a now nonexistent web
page.
--
(\__/) M.
(='.'=) If a man stands in a forest and no woman is around
(")_(") is he still wrong?
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
demise of sun.com Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-09-15 00:54 -0700
Re: demise of sun.com Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-09-15 08:27 -0700
Re: demise of sun.com Mark <i@dontgetlotsofspamanymore.invalid> - 2012-09-17 10:28 +0100
Re: demise of sun.com "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-09-17 06:51 -0400
Re: demise of sun.com Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-09-17 10:40 -0700
Re: demise of sun.com Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-09-17 17:39 -0400
Re: demise of sun.com Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-09-18 04:27 -0700
Re: demise of sun.com Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2012-09-18 19:41 +0000
Re: demise of sun.com Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-09-18 13:21 -0700
Re: demise of sun.com Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2012-09-18 21:29 +0000
Re: demise of sun.com Gunter Herrmann <notformail0106@earthlink.net> - 2012-09-19 13:30 -0400
Re: demise of sun.com Stanimir Stamenkov <s7an10@netscape.net> - 2012-09-19 00:42 +0300
csiph-web