Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #18807

Re: demise of sun.com

From Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: demise of sun.com
References <80d858l76kch632v7gdefamcecl18a646t@4ax.com> <821958dsvuebbng74ded6o3g436al8iktj@4ax.com> <m7rd58dh1dir8b30kltplg2tulhcp5f0cr@4ax.com> <nospam-6AC1A0.06513217092012@news.aioe.org>
Message-ID <4gJ5s.1035$4o5.805@newsfe23.iad> (permalink)
Date 2012-09-17 10:40 -0700

Show all headers | View raw


On 9/17/12 3:51 AM, John B. Matthews wrote:
> In article <m7rd58dh1dir8b30kltplg2tulhcp5f0cr@4ax.com>,
>   Mark <i@dontgetlotsofspamanymore.invalid> wrote:
>
>> This is particularly annoying when you search for a problem and find
>> a 'solution' in a forum, which is just a link to a now nonexistent
>> web page.
>
> And how! As a concrete example, I frequently cite _A Swing Architecture
> Overview_ formerly here:
>
> <http://java.sun.com/products/jfc/tsc/articles/architecture/>
>
> Now here:
>
> <http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/architecture-142923.html>
>
> Note how the (now missing) embedded images still refer to the old site.
>
> They (eventually) normalized the API documentation into a convenient
> scheme:
>
> <http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/index.html>
> <http://docs.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/index.html>
> Etc.
I really wish they had normalized it to 
/javase/latest/docs/api/index.html, with 
/javase/archive/6/docs/api/index.html for the "older" versions.  Google 
still links to 1.4 in some cases, and rarely to 7 specifically.
>
> I can only hope for the best, while preparing for the worst.
>

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

demise of sun.com Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-09-15 00:54 -0700
  Re: demise of sun.com Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-09-15 08:27 -0700
    Re: demise of sun.com Mark <i@dontgetlotsofspamanymore.invalid> - 2012-09-17 10:28 +0100
      Re: demise of sun.com "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-09-17 06:51 -0400
        Re: demise of sun.com Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-09-17 10:40 -0700
          Re: demise of sun.com Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-09-17 17:39 -0400
    Re: demise of sun.com Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-09-18 04:27 -0700
      Re: demise of sun.com Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2012-09-18 19:41 +0000
        Re: demise of sun.com Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-09-18 13:21 -0700
          Re: demise of sun.com Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2012-09-18 21:29 +0000
          Re: demise of sun.com Gunter Herrmann <notformail0106@earthlink.net> - 2012-09-19 13:30 -0400
      Re: demise of sun.com Stanimir Stamenkov <s7an10@netscape.net> - 2012-09-19 00:42 +0300

csiph-web